Ride The Walrus
A pretty cool guy.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 10,216
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Considering Torres was linked for 75M on his lone
re torres, i don think its as bad as his body has had enough, but i do think the last thing he needs was the world, he really needed entire summer of to recuperate. you'd still get more than hefty fee for them. but the question how much of the money would hodgson get for transfers?i dont think they are worth 100mill now days. its a shame but it looks like torres body has had enough ov all the niggles he gets which you cant blame him for not pushing 100%. and where people think gerrard had an ok world cup is beside me, our best player was proberly david james and knowone came close to even getting a mention.
It all depends on the quality of the replacements you could get in for them....So in this case I would accept. You could probably get Aguero in for 25-30m, someone like Diego for about 20m which would leave you with 50 million left to bolster the team.
But no-one could replace Gerrard :'(
Well then you're silly, and that's why you're not a manageri wouldnt pay 10p for them never mind 100m after their performance at the world cup a non-league teamn wouldnt even go for them
i wouldnt pay 10p for them never mind 100m after their performance at the world cup a non-league teamn wouldnt even go for them
a few bad games dont make you a bad player..i wouldnt pay 10p for them never mind 100m after their performance at the world cup a non-league teamn wouldnt even go for them
i wouldnt pay 10p for them never mind 100m after their performance at the world cup a non-league teamn wouldnt even go for them
No, simply because I could see Roy Hodgson signing Brede Hangeland for £20m and Zamora for £40M. XD
This is why football has gone out of hand with all this money.