Some interesting match ups in there I for one am looking forward to introducing Zlatan into my Croatian team
In theory then yes, but you miss out on hidden gems.. like Bertrand Traore at Burkina Faso.. and so on.
what does everyone think about only showing results for when a nation plays another selected nation and playing against a higher quality nation? For example we skip the Latvias, Tajikistans and Andorras. Only show a better/or equal nation?
So if Croatia plays Lithuania we skip but if Croatia play Holland then we show
It would save more time and you wouldn't have to choose all these **** players that will never get game time anyway
I'd keep playing the worse teams. For example, Spain's first game was Slovakia. Under the new rules, that would probably be a game you ignore. However, they have one very good player in the form of Marek Hamsik, who scored in the next game for Spain!
I would say that you keep all the games, show all of them. However, you give the player the ability to turn down taking a player from the team. So for example if Spain pay Luxembourg and win (which you would expect ) then, if I do t want any of the players, I can just say "nope, Spain doesn't want any of them".