Hughes needs time.Bringing in so many new players and trying to get them to play your way is hard. People slagging them off for every poor result is ******* me off. What have the fans or the club done to deserve all the ****? Nobody done this to Chelsea. Give the club some time.
Man City 3-3 Burnley
- Thread starter BBC Sport
- Start date
- Replies 68
- Views 3K
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
thank you someone who actually sees the truth, kris you know your stuff
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
smooth and cool? what a load of **** they bought more than us, they signed about 16 players, im not being funny mate kris hit the nail on the head, city fans were not hated by anyone, i am not getting cocky because we are getting good, i will always love city, if our owners leave and you liverpool fans keep calling us **** and we are in league 1 i will still love them, anyway how did they do it cool and smooth, and hughes hints at favoured big four is spot on also, at least he has the balls to say it unlike any other manager
---------- Post added at 05:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:50 PM ----------
---------- Post added at 05:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:50 PM ----------
it doesnt matter though date name guy so its not ok for any team outside the big four to spend money? if thats the case then the big four will forever rule, its ******* me off that if arsenal were doing this then no one would care.
Actually they were struggling. They had terrible debt issue's and did not make any signings the whole summer until Roman stepped in.
Sure Aannddyy is Right Man City have went about alot of things the wrong way. Public interest in Eto'o and Kaka to be exact.
Since then thought they have settled. I for one want them to succeed. I don't think Hughes is the man to do it but give it time. Ferguson took three years before he won anything with Man U.
I didn't say their was anything wrong with it, their is thoughXD, i was just saying chelseas transition to top force was smoother as they were already quite good while you were *****
arsenaljames22
Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2009
- Messages
- 437
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
sorry but today game it is
Jack Fulham
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,850
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think Tottenham are a annoying club that spend lots of money and win nothing just like Man City, no Intertoto Cup for you guys
To be honest if Phil Brown was told that he is going to get an infinate amount of money and will inharite a squad with Robinho in then he will start shouting about a top 4 finish! Anybody can buy a spot in Europe.. That's not the point.. Spend your money, we don't care!
Everything about Man City in the last 2 years since that Thailand guy owned you has been dodgy. Chelsea didn't go through half the **** Man City have.. Because there was a difference, Chelsea had potential, and didn't have to pay insane amounts of money for players, because their scouting system was good. They had a good set-up and that's why they turned into a household name almost instantly. Man City are and always will be the reserve side to Manchester United. There's nothing you can do, okay maybe when SAF goes United could fall apart, but I doubt it..
I have nothing against Man City or the fans, I just think you are being very naive. I wish City the best of luck but your doing it all wrong.. You've got, probably the 6th or 7th best team in the league.
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
didnt have to pay heres the list of their signings
Ranieri
Glen Johnson
Wayne Bridge
Frank Lampard
Damien Duff
Joe Cole
Geremi
Juan Veron
Arjen Robben
Claude Makelele
Adrian Mutu
Hernan Crespo
Petr Cech
Mourinho
Paulo Fereira
Ricardo Carvalho
Assier Del Horno
Tiago
Michael Essien
(That young fella Diarra?)
Shaun Wright-Phillips
Didier Drogba
Mateja Kezman
at least some of ours are good, some of those are ****
---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:07 PM ----------
shaun wright phillips 21 m a class player
we bought him back for 10m, thats bad business
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
ok lampard shouldnt be in there lol
I thought lampard shouldn't have been their<)
Though obviously chelsea have made some **** buys i think the point still stands that chelseas transition period was smoother since in their first season with roman they finished 2nd while you finished midtable
Though obviously chelsea have made some **** buys i think the point still stands that chelseas transition period was smoother since in their first season with roman they finished 2nd while you finished midtable
Last edited:
Jack Fulham
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,850
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
If Man City aren't allow to declare interest in players such as Kaka and Eto'o, Fergie never minds doing it does he but no one comes on here to complain about it, at the end of the day you have money, spend and clubs like Everton can just re-develop there sides, Man City haven't got that much better because Fulham can still go to Eastlands and get a result
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
thats true i guess, but we signed many players in the summer, and the likes of barry toure adebayor clingon play every week
i have been pleased with hughes signings, especially his january ones, given is class, bridge is very good and under rated in my opinion, de jong is just immense i love him, and bellamy has been a surprise package to be honest
ViVa La QuiRKe
Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
- Messages
- 314
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Why have Chelsea been brought into this, I've supported them since I was 5 (not just in it for the money) This is about Man City being in bad form and Burnley doing well, not Chelsea.
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
some guy had a pop at me saying city are ****, amazing how far having a pop at me can go mate,