Man Utd vs Rangers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rfc Andrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 155
  • Views Views 12K
pff ... without Berbatov Man Utd are pathetic XD What's wrong with Fergie.. We know W. Smith is a friend of his but come on .. :)
XD
We're still a one man team but now the one man is berbatov?oO)

Gutted about valencias injury. Some absolute ****** sat behind me was moaning about how long it took for him to be taken off. Some of our fans really are ******* twats.
 
XD
We're still a one man team but now the one man is berbatov?oO)

Gutted about valencias injury. Some absolute ****** sat behind me was moaning about how long it took for him to be taken off. Some of our fans really are ******* twats.

Should have punched his ******* face.
 
Wow some of the comments on this thread are laughable. Rangers fans saying we under estimated them, we never expected an apparent "Big club" to play 10 men behind the ball ffs. You wont qualify, you go out of the europe league to some club from albania, get over it.

To The Utd "Fans" I use Fans lightly, WTF are you saying, i see some actually asking if Fergie is a physco, some saying utd always disasppoint. Just think about what you are saying.

Everyone else, utd starting slow is nothing new. get over it, when we hit top gear done of you will be able to live with us, remember that.

Poor Old valencia, what a good player.
 
Wow some of the comments on this thread are laughable. Rangers fans saying we under estimated them, we never expected an apparent "Big club" to play 10 men behind the ball ffs. You wont qualify, you go out of the europe league to some club from albania, get over it.

To The Utd "Fans" I use Fans lightly, WTF are you saying, i see some actually asking if Fergie is a physco, some saying utd always disasppoint. Just think about what you are saying.

Everyone else, utd starting slow is nothing new. get over it, when we hit top gear done of you will be able to live with us, remember that.

Poor Old valencia, what a good player.

Liked the Rant, No matter what you do, we cant stop these kind of comments. ******* **** remember Superdude? He wanted SAF out.
 
ignore it scott, youve supported united long enough to know we'll always get that kinda comments, united have been here time and again. we know the drill, we know what we are like at the beginning of the season.
 
Rangers HAD to play that way, anyother way would have been a hammering for this reason ;

Rangers first 11 - total cost to assemble - 16.5 million.
Manchester united B team - total cost to assemble - 99.5 million

Thats the cost of the 2 squads that night

Ferdinand cost more than double the entire rangers team.

if we played the way man u played we would have been thrashed....

WELL DONE WALTER
 
Rangers HAD to play that way, anyother way would have been a hammering for this reason ;

Rangers first 11 - total cost to assemble - 16.5 million.
Manchester united B team - total cost to assemble - 99.5 million

Thats the cost of the 2 squads that night

Ferdinand cost more than double the entire rangers team.

if we played the way man u played we would have been thrashed....

WELL DONE WALTER

Half the teams in the Premiership would use the same game plan as RFC on a regular basis when going to OT; awfull to watch but they don't want to become cannon fodder. I expect us to use similar tactics this sunday
 
Rangers HAD to play that way, anyother way would have been a hammering for this reason ;

Rangers first 11 - total cost to assemble - 16.5 million.
Manchester united B team - total cost to assemble - 99.5 million

Thats the cost of the 2 squads that night

Ferdinand cost more than double the entire rangers team.

if we played the way man u played we would have been thrashed....

WELL DONE WALTER

the problem is, your probs do it at Ibrox as well. that doesnt really justify being in the Champions League to be honest.
 
the problem is, your probs do it at Ibrox as well. that doesnt really justify being in the Champions League to be honest.

Ehm yes it does. A team will play to its strengths, and for Rangers it is defending. Are you expecting all teams to go out all guns blazing and get thrashed by teams of Man Utd's calibre? Rangers are sensible, they know that playing defensively is their best chance of taking anything from the game.

Can you please explain why that doesn't justify being in the Champions' League? They won their domestic league, and therefore deserve to be in it. Do you think all counter attacking or defensively minded teams can't justify being in the Champions' League? It's a case of what works best for each team. Inter played a similar game against Barca, so have many other sides in Europe. I sense the reason for your outburst is that you're still hurting from 2 points lost...
 
Ehm yes it does. A team will play to its strengths, and for Rangers it is defending. Are you expecting all teams to go out all guns blazing and get thrashed by teams of Man Utd's calibre? Rangers are sensible, they know that playing defensively is their best chance of taking anything from the game.

Can you please explain why that doesn't justify being in the Champions' League? They won their domestic league, and therefore deserve to be in it. Do you think all counter attacking or defensively minded teams can't justify being in the Champions' League? It's a case of what works best for each team. Inter played a similar game against Barca, so have many other sides in Europe. I sense the reason for your outburst is that you're still hurting from 2 points lost...

im not hurting at all because i no come end of the group stage we're be in the pot for the next round where as rangers wont be. they barely held on for 90 minutes against a lot of fringe players, rangers have no quality what so ever.

and im sorry but parking a bus infront of your goal for 90 minutes isn't exactly a strenght. infact i see it as a sign of weakness if a team feel the need to just defend defend defend all game.
 
im not hurting at all because i no come end of the group stage we're be in the pot for the next round where as rangers wont be. they barely held on for 90 minutes against a lot of fringe players, rangers have no quality what so ever.

and im sorry but parking a bus infront of your goal for 90 minutes isn't exactly a strenght. infact i see it as a sign of weakness if a team feel the need to just defend defend defend all game.

I'd say it's a strength. Would you say Inter Milan's tendency to defend is a weakness?

If Rangers have 'no quality what so ever', why was the score 0-0? Surely Man Utd should thrash a team devoid of any quality? Defending like that is an art, I've seen many teams fail to do it properly. I'm not saying I enjoyed watching the game at all (in fact I found Rangers's constant defending terrible to watch) but you have to admire the discipline and their ability to hold formation. And i'm not even going to start on the arrogance in the opening sentence...
 
Wow some of the comments on this thread are laughable. Rangers fans saying we under estimated them, we never expected an apparent "Big club" to play 10 men behind the ball ffs. You wont qualify, you go out of the europe league to some club from albania, get over it.

A big club with no money whatsoever and incapable of keeping important players such as Nacho Novo. As it's been stated, Rangers is a big club because of fan base, and not because they're able to attract great players through money and win competitions. it was quite well illustrated this summer when Man Utd paid more for a completely unknown player (Bebe) than Rangers has spent for several years now. How can they compete with that? The Big Four to the Old Firm are what the Old Firm is to the rest of the SPL.

Rangers have bought only a few players the last few years, and Rangers have been incredibly impressive, much thanks to Walter Smith, just look at the league last year and the Europa Cup final. When you can't attract or keep talent and key players(e.g. Danny Wilson, Middlesbourgh (sp?)), you've got to try to make the best out of your squad using tactical approaches. Rangers knew very well what would happen if they opened up; just look at Celtic's last visit to OT when they opened up - a 3-0 thrashing. The Old Firm are simply not as good as the biggest teams in Europe, and Walter knows this, which is why he plays "negative" football against stronger teams (or look at when Walter or McLeish were managing Scotland). And for the Old Firm the money from the Group Stages in the CL is incredibly important, just look at Celtic's finances now, where imho a far more conservative fiscal strategy would be a lot sounder than going into debt.

Essentially,not many clubs can go to OT and carve their defence open and take the game to them. The last time a Scots club did that was back in 2006, when Celtic went to OT and lost 3-2. And expecting a club who has no money and has lost many of its key players to do so is pretty arrogant.
 
People need to stop moaning about Rangers tactics, Walter Smith got his team & tactics spot on...Can the same be said about Sir Alex?? I don't think so.

You need to understand that it was very frustrating for United fans to see a team defend for 90 minutes and show no ambition. Yes, it was effective and got Rangers a result but I guaran-****-tee if Rangers fans were on the other end of a parked bus that all the comments here would be the same.

It worked, Walter Smith was spot on with his tactics and you can't fault him for it, but don't act surprised by people moaning, because you'd be unhappy with it too.
 
Wow some of the comments on this thread are laughable. Rangers fans saying we under estimated them, we never expected an apparent "Big club" to play 10 men behind the ball ffs. You wont qualify, you go out of the europe league to some club from albania, get over it.

You weren't expecting Rangers to play like that? Have you EVER seen them play in Europe? They got to the Europa League final playing the usual 9-1 formation (they like to call it a 4-5-1 hehe) and Walter Smith said how defensively they'd play before the game.

That's why I can't understand why Man Utd didn't expect it. It's not like Rangers sprung some sort of tactical surprise... Rangers were always going to play defensively, so I really don't know why Man Utd didn't play some of their players who have the ability to break down a deep defence.
 
You need to understand that it was very frustrating for United fans to see a team defend for 90 minutes and show no ambition. Yes, it was effective and got Rangers a result but I guaran-****-tee if Rangers fans were on the other end of a parked bus that all the comments here would be the same.

It worked, Walter Smith was spot on with his tactics and you can't fault him for it, but don't act surprised by people moaning, because you'd be unhappy with it too.

They really should be moaning about Man Utd's RESERVES inability to break Rangers down Not Rangers tactics, as most teams go to OT and play a lone striker
 
Can't really blame rangers for going defensive. They knew they'd get creamed if they played an open game.
Really we should have been able to open them up but we were below par and i can't even remember us making any decent chances.
We did pretty much the same thing to barcelona in 07/08 champions league semis.

Nixon, it's pretty obvious we didn't start people like Nani, Berbatov and scholes because we wanted to rest them for the game on sunday.
 
the problem is, your probs do it at Ibrox as well. that doesnt really justify being in the Champions League to be honest.



So your moaning because we never layed down and lost?

who gives manchester united the god given right to beat everyone?
 
A big club with no money whatsoever and incapable of keeping important players such as Nacho Novo. As it's been stated, Rangers is a big club because of fan base, and not because they're able to attract great players through money and win competitions. it was quite well illustrated this summer when Man Utd paid more for a completely unknown player (Bebe) than Rangers has spent for several years now. How can they compete with that? The Big Four to the Old Firm are what the Old Firm is to the rest of the SPL.

Rangers have bought only a few players the last few years, and Rangers have been incredibly impressive, much thanks to Walter Smith, just look at the league last year and the Europa Cup final. When you can't attract or keep talent and key players(e.g. Danny Wilson, Middlesbourgh (sp?)), you've got to try to make the best out of your squad using tactical approaches. Rangers knew very well what would happen if they opened up; just look at Celtic's last visit to OT when they opened up - a 3-0 thrashing. The Old Firm are simply not as good as the biggest teams in Europe, and Walter knows this, which is why he plays "negative" football against stronger teams (or look at when Walter or McLeish were managing Scotland). And for the Old Firm the money from the Group Stages in the CL is incredibly important, just look at Celtic's finances now, where imho a far more conservative fiscal strategy would be a lot sounder than going into debt.

Essentially,not many clubs can go to OT and carve their defence open and take the game to them. The last time a Scots club did that was back in 2006, when Celtic went to OT and lost 3-2. And expecting a club who has no money and has lost many of its key players to do so is pretty arrogant.

I am not disagreeing with all that, but for rangers fans( some) to say we under estimated there "quality" and to act like this is some sort of major victory is kinda sad, as they wont even qualify. and it was a side that most teams in the epl would of beat easily.
 
I am not disagreeing with all that, but for rangers fans( some) to say we under estimated there "quality" and to act like this is some sort of major victory is kinda sad, as they wont even qualify. and it was a side that most teams in the epl would of beat easily.


I doubt most epl sides could beat rangers if man u couldnt....
 
Back
Top