FyrstWalterLFC
Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
I see good reviews on TFF's new tactic, "Beast". Adding it to test list
Looking forward to the results!
I see good reviews on TFF's new tactic, "Beast". Adding it to test list
I see good reviews on TFF's new tactic, "Beast". Adding it to test list
Best one for me. (H) I'll be disappointed if it has low points.
It won't, it's a 3CD tactic... I guess the trend is on, now...
MRL[h=1]WHEELS OF FIRE 3412 IWB Knap has updated to v2 ..tested plsI see good reviews on TFF's new tactic, "Beast". Adding it to test list
I see good reviews on TFF's new tactic, "Beast". Adding it to test list
Looking forward to the results!
Best one for me. (H) I'll be disappointed if it has low points.
The test results have just been posted, but unfortunately average results...
TESTED Beast
- [TABLE="class: table table-condensed, width: 1140"]
[TR="bgcolor: #C1C1C1"]
[TH="align: left"]Team[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Formation[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Games[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]TotP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]HP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]AP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]GS[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]GC[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Diff[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]RATING[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SubTop[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_nom"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_tp"]145[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_hp"]83[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_ap"]62[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_gs"]170[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_gc"]110[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_diffg"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_rank"]57[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #F8F8F8"]
[TD]Underdog[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_nom"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_tp"]123[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_hp"]63[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_ap"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_gs"]141[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_gc"]138[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_diffg"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_rank"]47[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Total[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_nom"]180[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_tp"]268[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_hp"]146[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_ap"]122[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_gs"]311[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_gc"]248[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_diffg"]63[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_rank"]52[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
MRLWHEELS OF FIRE 3412 IWB Knap has updated to v2 ..tested pls
Yeah, not bad, it's just that I had higher hopes for that one. People were saying it was TFF better tactic, but test results are on par with his other tactics.We actually consider 250+ rating a very good tactic. With 268 it's definitely a very good tactic Our star system reflects this also! 4 stars is great!
And, also remember that our test is pretty much an underdog test, and will not necessarily reflect how the tactic performs with better teams.
Yeah, not bad, it's just that I had higher hopes for that one. People were saying it was TFF better tactic, but test results are on par with his other tactics.
mate i cant understand how all these gyus perfoming so well with the beast..i played a few games i have success but not this that they are talking aabout...343 and 3412 from stephen are the best for me so far...and next the warpigs from knapYeah, not bad, it's just that I had higher hopes for that one. People were saying it was TFF better tactic, but test results are on par with his other tactics.
The test results have just been posted, but unfortunately average results...
TESTED Beast
- [TABLE="class: table table-condensed, width: 1140"]
[TR="bgcolor: #C1C1C1"]
[TH="align: left"]Team[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Formation[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Games[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]TotP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]HP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]AP[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]GS[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]GC[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]Diff[/TH]
[TH="align: left"]RATING[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SubTop[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_nom"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_tp"]145[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_hp"]83[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_ap"]62[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_gs"]170[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_gc"]110[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_diffg"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: st_tactic_rank"]57[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #F8F8F8"]
[TD]Underdog[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_nom"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_tp"]123[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_hp"]63[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_ap"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_gs"]141[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_gc"]138[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_diffg"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: un_tactic_rank"]47[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Total[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_module"]3-4-1-2[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_nom"]180[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_tp"]268[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_hp"]146[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_ap"]122[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_gs"]311[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_gc"]248[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_diffg"]63[/TD]
[TD="class: tactic_rank"]52[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Thanks for testing! I'm curious, how do you do your testing? Is there anywhere to read about it?
I just did a very simple simulation test of the Watford 3-4-3 v2 VS TTFs Beast with Liverpool. Watford tactic won the league 9 points down to Arsenal while Arsenal won with 4 points on the Beast sim. So that's pretty much in line with your results is guess.
We actually consider 250+ rating a very good tactic. With 268 it's definitely a very good tactic Our star system reflects this also! 4 stars is great!
And, also remember that our test is pretty much an underdog test, and will not necessarily reflect how the tactic performs with better teams.
Sorry Mr L. you're legend for me but I don't think that results are realistic. I've tried Beast with 4 different team it's like Deep Scilian. Just cup cup cup! For me far better than all tactics at 17.