jasonbhoys
Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 2,216
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
W4nker any chance of tc version of 2 5 3, sorry for being annoying
Try the 253 mate it's amazingView attachment 368461
Sicilian Defence isnt much fun ? How more fun do you want in your first match with this tactic ? Only changed the cm to am
View attachment 368461
Sicilian Defence isnt much fun ? How more fun do you want in your first match with this tactic ? Only changed the cm to am
W4nker any chance of tc version of 2 5 3, sorry for being annoying
All you do is move the FB's to WB's in the TC version of the 433 that's on the OP.
so use the rock with a small club till you make them big then play the 253 but if you are a big club play the 253 from the off?
Someone give me link for 4-2-3-1 Gung Ho Classic
Cheers mate, gentlemen, MR L what's your match prep for your 3 6 1
just been having a play around with the rock moved the dm up to cm to make 3cm and moved the ml and mr upto aml and amr but left the setting as is and it looks like it is working very well still strong at the back and still scoring for fun
Working on a new one already 4-4-2 Stonewall Attack! (Haven't decided 100% on the formation yet though. Considering 4-2-3-1 as well) High scoring stuff! But this one will require a lot of work, so won't be releasing this one in a while Enjoy the other new ones meanwhile
All the tactics above 50 points are good
That's amazing! I hope you wıll be successful with 4-2-3-1. How much time do you need this tactic?Working on a new one already 4-4-2 Stonewall Attack! (Haven't decided 100% on the formation yet though. Considering 4-2-3-1 as well) High scoring stuff! But this one will require a lot of work, so won't be releasing this one in a while Enjoy the other new ones meanwhile
How much time do you need this tactic?
until you see it on the front page
That's amazing! I hope you wıll be successful with 4-2-3-1. How much time do you need this tactic?
I think you're after requesting you can make the best tactic. I'm on 4-2-3-1 tactic's side because no one that doesn't have such a tactic. There are those who succeed with 4-4-2 but 4-2-3-1 NO,unfortunately. But of course I respect your tactic decision.I don't think it's possible to make a 4-2-3-1 as good as the other latest ones I've made, at least not suitable for all teams. So will maybe make the tactic with a top team instead, and tell people only to use it for top teams.
I think you're after requesting you can make the best tactic. I'm on 4-2-3-1 tactic's side because no one that doesn't have such a tactic. There are those who succeed with 4-4-2 but 4-2-3-1 NO, unfortunately. But of course I respect your tactic decision.