My best tactic for FM14

  • Thread starter Thread starter callamity
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1K
  • Views Views 653K
the link of tactic in the first page is a only one version of the tactic ?
 
Truly stunning results. Won premiership first season with Nottingham Forest, only by a point on the last day mind you. Having trouble with screenshots on my computer at the moment but will get them up soon. Done what I always do though for third season and bought too many excellent strikers. Worthwhile loaning fierro out for a season or is that just gonna make him angry?
 
Truly stunning results. Won premiership first season with Nottingham Forest, only by a point on the last day mind you. Having trouble with screenshots on my computer at the moment but will get them up soon. Done what I always do though for third season and bought too many excellent strikers. Worthwhile loaning fierro out for a season or is that just gonna make him angry?

you wont like him when he's angry...

your in third season and fierro isnt good enough to start? who are your other strikers? I have a habbit of forcing progress on players like fierro giving them more games than I should lol.
 
I'm still tinkering who to play as a MR and ML in this formation. As of now I'm starting Florenzi and Gervinho. Bought Iturbe but maybe it's best to play him as a false 9.

which team are you?

I literally got to the point where i use quick pick with any team i load up and then just sign young players I want to fill the holes in the teams. Getting younger players allows me to mould them into how I want them to play, for example the right winger I normally buy is augustine allione, left winger zakkari bakkali (unsure of spelling) but it takes maybe a year or two till they are first teamers.
 
Nice, capital cup win too well done mate

Cheers,i did notice that once promotion had been assured performances started to drop so i changed the way i did team talks and finished the season on a winning run.
 
I had Mitrovic last season and he was beast but my only striker. Bought Luciano vietto during the summer but then interest in fierro picked up and I didn't want to miss out. Plus when you are given 78 million in transfer funds it's hard not to overpurchase. Don't think I'll be able to give all three of them enough game time to develop and fierro is the only one who's squad status isn't key player. Probably not the most appropriate place to put this question but considering it's the success of your tactic that has created this beautiful problem thought I'd ask.
 
I had Mitrovic last season and he was beast but my only striker. Bought Luciano vietto during the summer but then interest in fierro picked up and I didn't want to miss out. Plus when you are given 78 million in transfer funds it's hard not to overpurchase. Don't think I'll be able to give all three of them enough game time to develop and fierro is the only one who's squad status isn't key player. Probably not the most appropriate place to put this question but considering it's the success of your tactic that has created this beautiful problem thought I'd ask.

It's a fair question, in any tactic squad management is key :)

I think it might be appropriate to evaluate your team's squad status, I never have more than a few "key" players, I keep it to maybe 3 or 4, then say 4-6 first team players, then the rotational/back up players have increased pools. This will help with maintaining squad happiness. If you have 3 strikers now you can keep them at the club, give your best striker the starting spot, your second best striker the subs spot and third here if injuries happen.

If you start say fierro in cup games/league games you are guaranteed to win, he will happily be a bit part player getting around 15 games a season. your sub player will be coming on throughout the season and can probably be rotated more evenly getting around 20-25 games, and your main striker starts the most important games, probably getting roughly 40 games a season.

Im not saying there are 80 games a season to play here but substitute appearances etc count towards this tally
 
It's a fair question, in any tactic squad management is key :)

I think it might be appropriate to evaluate your team's squad status, I never have more than a few "key" players, I keep it to maybe 3 or 4, then say 4-6 first team players, then the rotational/back up players have increased pools. This will help with maintaining squad happiness. If you have 3 strikers now you can keep them at the club, give your best striker the starting spot, your second best striker the subs spot and third here if injuries happen.

If you start say fierro in cup games/league games you are guaranteed to win, he will happily be a bit part player getting around 15 games a season. your sub player will be coming on throughout the season and can probably be rotated more evenly getting around 20-25 games, and your main striker starts the most important games, probably getting roughly 40 games a season.

Im not saying there are 80 games a season to play here but substitute appearances etc count towards this tally


Thanks for that. Squad management is definitely a stumbling block for myself, a little greedy when it comes to young talent. I'll try that until the January window and hopefully everyone will still be getting on like a big football family. Cheers callamity.
 
Couldn't get the AMR/L thing working, not that the original tactic isn't a beast.

I think the ME can only get the AI winning by making you miss your "many" chances whilst the AI can practically score with "every" chance.

As it is the game is ruined for me and has now become unplayable, i mean what's the point when you outplay the opposition EVERY SINGLE GAME and can only be beat by the ME making your players miss open goals and the AI can win with yet another "fluke" goal?

FM is dead.

To throw every thing you've typed out the window, I only need to present one fact. The ME can't differentiate between the human user and the AI.
 
which team are you?

I literally got to the point where i use quick pick with any team i load up and then just sign young players I want to fill the holes in the teams. Getting younger players allows me to mould them into how I want them to play, for example the right winger I normally buy is augustine allione, left winger zakkari bakkali (unsure of spelling) but it takes maybe a year or two till they are first teamers.

Playing with AS Roma. I will look into these two players. Decided that Iturbe will be mould as a winger
 
thanks callamity for this great tactic ..

i switched to urs in the mid first season with lazio

we managed to secure the 4th position 1 point from the 3rd in the last day of the season, i was hoping to qualify for champions league but this is a good achievment considering no transfer made to the original squad

in Europa League we made it all to the final knocking out BAYERN and this happend

View attachment 443603

but unfortunatly we lost the final to tottenham 2-1


in the second season we made some good transfers but its almost the same squad

we won the league

View attachment 443602

and we won italian cup

View attachment 443601

beating ac milan in the final

View attachment 443600



Europa League we lost the final on penalities to real madrid with cristiano scoring in the last min of the extra time XD

View attachment 443599



sorry for bad english
 
Says who?..............................................oh SI said it, so it must be true yeah? or could they just be covering up for a ridiculously poor ME?

Believe what you want mate, the truth has never been more blatant than in this FM.

Do you walk around wearing a tin foil hat?
 
Based on what? ;)

8 ( correct Tony ?) years of being frustrated with the game :D

Anyway, lets end this dicussion now so the author of this thread dont get it spammed . There is simply no way you are going to agree on how the game works :D
 
Based on a few things

1. SI ban anyone immediately who bring it up

2. They had a bloke on their once who proved it(he was banned and all posts removed)

3. Just watch games, how does the AI continue to score against the human game after game with barely a shot and/or a chance and how many times the human player has a stupid amount of simple chances missed and the AI score with 1 effort and win.

I bet you still believe in Santa ;)


Anyway, lets end this dicussion now so the author of this thread dont get it spammed . There is simply no way you are going to agree on how the game works
grin.gif
 
Back
Top