The Award has already been given so theres no need to argue. Nasri Won it. Malouda didn't. CJACKO get over it.
I wasen't even under it, i put my opinion and its being questioned and im putting my points out whats wrong with that??
The Award has already been given so theres no need to argue. Nasri Won it. Malouda didn't. CJACKO get over it.
If this is based on only the 10/11 season so far then Nasri wins hands down.
If it includes from January onwards in the 09/10 season then I'd give it to Malouda.
As you mentioned, Chelsea are in a run of bad form, so he has not managed to find fluency and consistency yet, i think that all makes an impact plus Nasri did not even make it to the WC, if u look at the whole year in general where Malouda helped Chelsea win the Double I think it should have gone to Malouda,
I didn't say that... They are, but so are Arsenal. Malouda played well in a team that was scoring two or three or more on a regular basis, Nasri is scoring for fun in a team that has been shockingly inconsistent and has been the stand out player week after week.
Nasri didn't make it to the WC because Domenech is a ******* ****** - look how well they did in the WC without him, oh wait..
lol and with him, I expect France would have gone on to win the WC, face it there was lots on infighting in the squad and there were rumours that during earlier France Games when Nasri was selected, he and Benzema used to cause friction in the squad
Well deserved. I have a feeling that we haven't even seen his best yet. He is young and will develop into a legend like Zidane.