PhilipRhys
Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2010
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Hey, if you're team are top of the league and you have 4 different tactics, then its good in my view... As long as you're winning games, there's nothing really to question, unless your team are scraping results... But yeah, 4 is fine, as long as your players are adapting to them....I hope you can give me some help. Right now I'm managing PSV and I'm first in the eredivisie( Dutch top league) and I've created 4 different tactics that suit the team all with similar team and player instructions. So far it's worked really well because I pick one of the four tactics which would be strongest against my opponent. My questions and the points where I need some advice on is first of all: Is it good to have more than 3 tactics (since team preparation allows 3)
Secondly: how should I adapt and make the step from PSV to a team like Brighton? I just can't manage teams that aren't in the top division because of the lack of finance and i can't find the balance between attack and defense for teams like Brighton when playing against bigger teams.
Second - Clearly you can never repeat your success on another club, especially a club like Brighton... You're gunna have to take a lot of time to have a look at your players attributes to decide exactly what tactic to use... Sometimes you can use your assisstant to pick a team on a specific type of play, be it attacking, defensive, etc... When using lower league clubs, I use this as a base, I get my assisstant to pick a team best for attacking purposes, and then I put in players that I personally think should be in there....
Also go to advanced player instructions, get your players to play to their strengths... This should help too....
Get back to me if you need any more advice....