PARAGON !

addrew said:
Hmm, few days ago you said wingers was the way to go. Now you go for the reverse foots for wingers once again. Will try this out soon :P
Click to expand...

Ehhh... it came out that the problem was not Inside Forwards and the poor attacking-build play was the problem...
 
TotalFootballFan9 said:
Ehhh... it came out that the problem was not Inside Forwards and the poor attacking-build play was the problem...
Click to expand...

Thanks. Was going to ask the same question.

And thanks for the Inside Forwards' version. Now my Napoli side can utilize Berardi and Insigne to the fullest.
 
Last edited:
I love these tactics!
Haven't thanked you for the others, but this is beautiful.

So, finally...Thank you for a suberb job and dedication :D
 
addrew said:
Hmm, few days ago you said wingers was the way to go. Now you go for the reverse foots for wingers once again. Will try this out soon :P
Click to expand...

Both can work depending on tactic, I think IFs are easier to implement as full backs are so effective so it's better to leave space for them to move into. This can be achieved with wide midfielders (playing as wingers) though as you can get them to sit narrower.
 
Wide mid are slight better than IF , correct? i ll go for Wide -attacking if yes so
 
TotalFootballFan9 said:
If you use the Attacking version then remove AMC

If you use the Balanced version then remove MCL position move DM to MCL position and give DM Central Midfielder(Defend) role (the same as in the Attacking version).
Click to expand...

Hey TFF, fistly thanks for all tactics that you made :). And if you can, please tell me what tactic is better for underdog. Thanks for the reply :)
 
Second season in Prem after avoiding relegation with Burton Albion and now some fantastic results using inside forward version. beating even Arsenal away..

KYJ1OTr.png
 
SkuaY said:
Hey TFF, fistly thanks for all tactics that you made :). And if you can, please tell me what tactic is better for underdog. Thanks for the reply :)
Click to expand...
Imo Conqueror. 4-4-2 tactics are stronger overall, especially for underdog sides. 4-3-3 takes stronger/more well rounded forward players while 4-4-2 can use more specialized players.

I'll try Paragon out and report back though ;-)
 
fabrizioadriano said:
why you don't change your tactics? you only open new thread and bla bla bla.
Click to expand...

No one asked you or told you to use any of TFFs tactics or even to post in the thread - but hey you can make threads here too, got something different you want to show and share, or is it just an troll attempt/post count boost?
 
KarlBr said:
Imo Conqueror. 4-4-2 tactics are stronger overall, especially for underdog sides. 4-3-3 takes stronger/more well rounded forward players while 4-4-2 can use more specialized players.

I'll try Paragon out and report back though ;-)
Click to expand...

Thanks :)

Tripoligate4 said:
he say balance :)
Click to expand...

I meant which of 2 balance tactic with WM or IF is better :).
 
The balanced version that i downloaded have atack mentality and the atracking version have control mentality.
is that correct?
 
they only "challenge" i see in these balanced/attacking tactic sets is this; Choose a country where your team is as dominant as PSG is in Ligue 1 irl, but unlike PSG you're a small weak team hitting European competitions, it might get important to have AMs there can play MCs and MCs there can play DMC or keeping a squad fitting both types of tactics could be a small problem or a challenge.

But whit that said, nice to see both types of tactics in the same thread :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top