Evidently not. See below Shots, Shot on Target and (most amazingly) CCCs comparison. Just a small (but ******* stupid) annoyance is that for the OM goal, they score with their one and only shot on target (not even a CCC) for the whole half from....a corner to goal mouth scramble.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidiculous.
View attachment 519571
This says it all. From the match report:
View attachment 519580
I don't want to be a **** but there's not much wrong with your two posts.
While the bugs, like corner scramble and GKs becoming Superman are genuine, the previous and this post are not ridiculous.
Chelsea created way more clear cut chances, 1-4 right? Score was 1-2, you can't win every match.
And all this stuff happens in real life too, but managers can't blame match engine in their pressers. ****, David Moyes almost did by saying "I don't know what I've to do to win."
Recent match
Spurs 1 - 0 Everton
http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/720743/Live
Everton has 3 clear cut chances with Mirallas being selfish and skying one. Tottenham's goal came from not clear cut chance but clever set piece by Walker.
Spurs - Newcastle match at WHL, Newcastle won.
Chelsea - West Ham, 39 shots to their 2, at least 4 clear cut chances and many half chances, 0-0.
Chelsea - Newcastle fairly even match and almost equal amount of clear cut chances, 3-0 win.
In real life there's no stat like Clear cut chances, but I'm talking about matches I've watched and I've a sharp memory.
While this patch and even previous patch had bugs and my frustration got me to punch my laptop's screen and break it, yours is of a very very low level and to label it ridiculous is ridiculous itself.
Also check in the amount of long shots your team might be taking as they have VERY low chance of going in. That also matters a lot.
Sent from my C2104 using Tapatalk