Sahar's 4-1-2-2-1 Goalstorm(11.3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter SaharFM11
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 178
  • Views Views 127K
What about the pitch size?
Which pitch size will suit this tactics best?
 
hi sahar i will try your tactic...later on tonigh i will start a season with bolton media prediction 14 in premiership...i hope for a good season :)
 
Excellent mate, try make a new, detailed thread and watch your downloads fly :D
 
schlafanzughose said:
Do you use Opposition Instructions or is it plug&play?
Click to expand...

Plug and Play

---------- Post added 08/06/2011 at 12:15 PM ---------- Previous post was 06/06/2011 at 08:45 PM ----------

More?

---------- Post added 10/06/2011 at 04:34 PM ---------- Previous post was 08/06/2011 at 12:15 PM ----------

Bump
 
Nice results you got there. I'll give your tactic a go in my test savegame if you want. I'll post the results here.
 
Okay, so I tested the tactic with a "Tactics Test" database, places by someone here on FM-Base a while ago.
The game contains 3 controllable teams to avoid any coincidence: Tactics Test 1 (TT1), 2 (TT2) and 3 (TT3). Each team is given 50 players (every position is covered at least 3 times) with a CA between 140 and 150.

Before we take a look at the testing results, may I remind you that this only gives a brief overview of how good the tactic by itself is. There are no OP, team talk or slight changes. Do not underestimate your own input.

Ok, the results:

Test 1, season 1:

View attachment 175794
View attachment 175800

TT2 had a really good season. I've only seen one other tactic that managed to let a team end second. TT1 and TT3 on the other hand ended, compared to other tactic that I've tested, ended fairly low on the table. This is why I decided to run a second test.


Test 2, season 1:

View attachment 175795
View attachment 175801

In this test run, the tactic disappointed me. Compared to the previous test, these results were not good. TT2 dropped a staggering 8 places and TT1 dropped one. TT3 on the other hand, went 1 up. I couldn't accept this result, so I did another kind of test: I've let both tests run a second season.


Test 1, season 2:

View attachment 175796
View attachment 175802

As you can see: once the team has adapted itself to the formation, the results you get are good/very good. I was happy with the result, but I had to run the "bad" test too.


Test 2, season 2:

View attachment 175798
View attachment 175803

Although the first season wasn't good at all, this season the teams performed considerably better. In overall, they almost did as good as test 1 season 2.


Conclusion
I think that purely the tactic on its own is one of the better tactics out there. It has a lot of potential.
What I didn't upload are the fixtures. I took a look at them and I saw that this tactic crushed the opposition quite a few times (6 - 0, 8 - 2, 4 - 0, 5 - 0, 5 - 1, ...) and it never suffered a heavy defeat (except against ManU I think, 1 - 4 or something).


It's definitely worth the try!



Any questions?
 
Last edited:
This isn't your tactic. It's exactly the same as vu duc tu's Goalstorm tactic on the SIboards.
 
Ahh sorry then, cheers for clearing that up quickly. Sorry if I sounded like a **** ;)
 
This is a great tactic! No shouts, no oi's and no match prep. Simple plug and play, simply great.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top