The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Jak said:
really? If he is found guilty can the FA punish him too?
Click to expand...

Yes.

Leon Knight (Chelsea reject) talks so much rubbish it's unreal. https://twitter.com/#!/LeonKnight82

And I love his excuse for his bio (" they say a ni**er old they think a ni**er off I'm runway one way taking off !!") - he said "

@lang_rko
I am one so I can say what I like so shut the **** up and get back to work. ​

#yafruit". How does that work? Jesus.
 
Last edited:
Jak said:
if he is only fined £2500 it will be an outrage
Click to expand...

Right, I need to say this.

Believe it or not, he is like my 2nd father even without knowing him personally; like a role model; like personal God - well he is my lifetime idol and my hero. I'll always stand behind him and support him through hard times and would walk through **** for him.

BUT, if that bastardish **** Suarez(back off pool fans)was charged 8 games off the pitch, I must say, unfortunately, that if JT is guilty, then he should be charged as well. as simple as that. no more, no less.
 
The CPS had to charge him regardless of whether they know precisely what he has said or not.

If they dismissed it they would be seen as doing an improper investigation and took the viewpoint of JT.

The problem with this case is the distinction between 'blind' and 'black' through lip reading video has to be an almost impossible 3rd party distinction. John Terry has to hope that someone around him heard what he said because with respect to Anton Ferdinand he is going off lip reading primarily and clearly he is of the opinion he said 'black'.

Completely different investigation to the Suarez-Evra one, far more complex, but I feel the same about this one as the FA investigated incident with Suarez.

The independent panel the FA sanctioned to look over and charge Suarez has spent weeks analysing the evidence - most of which us as the public are not privvy to - and you have to accept their verdict along with their charge.

If John Terry gets convicted everyone has to accept the charge because frankly we are not well placed to judge in either of these incidents and like Dalglish/Liverpool should not argue with the FAIP verdict Chelsea and AVB should not argue with whatever outcome happens over the next 12 months.

Saying all of that, we must stress and remember that the CPS always had to pursue this as a matter of public interest whether they had substantial evidence or not so we must still presume innocence in this case.
 
Jak said:
really? If he is found guilty can the FA punish him too?
Click to expand...

Yes they can, if guilty im sure the FA will come down hard on him like they have done with Suarez. Saying that i only hope he gets a 4 game ban because thats all Suarez's would have been if he didnt bite someone at Ajax
 
They're going through all of this just to give him a £2500 fine, at most?
What's the point? Just let the FA deal with it.
 
On a potential Terry replacement papers seem to think we have the Cahil deal in the bag. Would be a decent signing especially as we might need him if Terry gets found guilty.
 
CJACKO11 said:
On a potential Terry replacement papers seem to think we have the Cahil deal in the bag. Would be a decent signing especially as we might need him if Terry gets found guilty.
Click to expand...


more excited about the prospect of them both playing alongside each other. What a pair that'd be.
 
£2,500 is probably what John Terry wipes his **** with in a morning.

FA have to ask if the CPS find him guilty.
 
AVB will continue to play the high line, thats what he wants to do. Makes for exciting football on Chelseas part which is never a bad thing to see, however slow defenders doesn't make for good defending with a high line lol
 
I wouldn't call Cahill particularly slow, but when paired with JT it is extremely dangerous because neither have a lot of pace; one of them partnering David Luiz, however should in theory work quite well.
 
Mike. said:
But he eventually wants to, buying a player who cant do that doesnt make sense
Click to expand...

ChrisBird said:
I wouldn't call Cahill particularly slow, but when paired with JT it is extremely dangerous because neither have a lot of pace; one of them partnering David Luiz, however should in theory work quite well.
Click to expand...

Thats my point really mike, with Luiz at CB along side Cahil (who is quicker than JT) it could work. Also with Romeu in the side he acts as another CB so you get that extra cover if needed.
 
When Essien gets back it'll all fall into place. You've missed him.
 
Jack said:
When Essien gets back it'll all fall into place. You've missed him.
Click to expand...

Agreed mate, if he can even get back to half of what he used to do then my god what a bonus that will be. Latest reports that it might not be until the end of January but sooner the better.
 
I still cannot fathom why people get so excited about Gary Cahill. He's got a good touch for a centre-back and he's dangerous in the opposition penalty box, but he's been one of Bolton's worst players this season. I'm not even exaggerating: he's been outperformed by David Wheater (who has a superior amount of blocked shots, interceptions and a hugely better tackling record) and Zat Knight (again, way better tackling, marginally more interceptions and has given away less fouls) to name just two of his central defensive partners.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top