Oh has he? Imo he had some great games this season which was his first. Just look at Stoke game at Emirates for example.
And maybe he isn't allowed to speak anything about clubs or his move to press.
Suprising he has not mentioned Chelsea at all though, Gervinho has been absolutely cack at Arsenal so far.
Oh has he? Imo he had some great games this season which was his first. Just look at Stoke game at Emirates for example.
And maybe he isn't allowed to speak anything about clubs or his move to press.
One half decent game in a season, sorry must of missed that one. Whenever I have seen him I can see why he has been playing throughout the season less and less, been pretty awful.
Yeh I know he won't be allowed to speak to the press, but why can't it just be confirmed already. How does the friendly against England effect anything.
So for you 1 goal and 2 assists against Stoke is half decent game? What would be amazing for you? For his first season he was pretty good for first part of season in which games he started.
After ACN he was mainly used as sub and he didn't perform as well. He takes time to get used into game and 10-15 minutes at end of match isn't enough for him.
He did not start much for the second part of the season for a reason, he just did not look good to me, big step up from Ligue 1 to Premier League though.
Chelsea to land Lille playmaker Eden Hazard for £32m | Football | The Guardian Hulk and Hazard to Chelsea for £62m?Now way would we compile with the FFP.
Luka Modric, a regista able to supply the front three/four. RB should be less of a priority this window, ramires/luiz/essien can play as back up there. the role of number 1 striker should go to Torres, with better service from Modric/Hazard/Mata, he should "theoretically" do better
If you get Modric then other teams will worry at the moment Chelsea still seem an unbalanced team without a regista like him.
I don't tend to agree with this, if anyone watched Chelsea under Di Matteo then one of our stand out players was Frank Lampard playing in this deeper playmaker role. Now im not suggesting for one second that he is better than Modric at doing this but he is a very intellegent man and played brilliantly well there and may even play that role for England this summer. If thats the case then i also believe we have a younger man in the wings in Josh McEachran who suits this role down to the ground so maybe Lamps will be first choice and Josh take over the reigns in the future. It's a solution.
We also do not know whether all the transfer fees are upfront or anything, they may be something upfront and monthly installments which will make it easier to comply with FFP.
Agree with you here. There were some rumours when AVB was sacked that Meireles would like to go? Do you think you should sell him if possible?
Yes, 100%. The games he played could have been played by McEachran instead.
The new stadium is an absolute kicker in terms of FFP. IF chelsea get that, they will be laughing, because as far as i remember it counts as infrastructure, meaning Roman can plough money into building it without getting penalised.
The new stadium is an absolute kicker in terms of FFP. IF chelsea get that, they will be laughing, because as far as i remember it counts as infrastructure, meaning Roman can plough money into building it without getting penalised.
I dont think they would have, Di Matteo seems to like Meireles as well. Not sure why to be honest, be he does.
Yer i believe club can do anything in terms of building things and money into the acadmeys etc without it counting towards FFP.
Yer he does seem to like him especially in the bigger games because he just kicks people lol.
It's vital the the opposition come round to this, because its the only way that the club can go forward, and be self sufficient. And when else is someone going to build a stadium for you, at no cost to the fans?