When did I say Torres was a bad player? I just said he couldn't score for toffee.. which he couldn't. Don't give me that **** about him being under pressure because of the transfer record and adapting to a new club - he had a **** season all-round. He wasn't scoring for Liverpool, and he scored once (after more than 10 games?) for Chelsea. But instead of dropping him, Carlo had to play him - you can't just drop a £50m striker that quickly; he thought he had to justify the (Roman's) signing, so he played him and desperately tried to fit in while Sturridge was scoring for fun on loan at Bolton.
Just read on Twitter:
"Chelsea have spent more money on sacking managers in the last 5 years than Arsenal have spent on players".
He did not have a bad season at all... he scored 13 goals which is very decent, nothing spectacular but nothing bad either and yes going for 50m in the January Transfer window does make a difference u know, it creates alot of pressure on the player as he has to adapt to new tactics and new surroundings and a new team, ask any manager even Wenger
---------- Post added at 08:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:44 PM ----------
In the last 5 years we have won 2 Premiere League titles, 3 FA Cups and 1 League Cup and have gotten to 2 CL Semi-Finals where we got knocked out against Barca and 1 CL Final which we were a penalty away from winning while the only final Arsenal have gotten to is the League Cup...
Yes i prefer our system
Impressive, what do you want, a bun?
Impressive, what do you want, a bun?
Since you brought up history,
Arsenal - 39 Chelsea - 23
Impressive, what do you want, a bun?
Since you brought up history,
Arsenal - 39 Chelsea - 23
Legend!!!!
---------- Post added at 08:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 PM ----------
Well considering we have only been a top side for 8 years the gap isent that big lol.
Being a top side or not is irrelevant.
Being a top side or not is irrelevant.
I can't fathom why Chelsea are being linked with strikers. They really, REALLY don't need a striker.
err... yes it is, its why people dont compare Man Utd's and Wolves trophy cabinet for example
I agree. If we spend all this money we are only going to be like City when they first started spending and jsut have a ton of strikers in our team.
Impressive, what do you want, a bun?
Since you brought up history,
Arsenal - 39 Chelsea - 23
Well exactly. What Chelsea need is a right-back and some midfielders and wide forwards. They don't need strikers.
You mean: Arsenal - 125 Chelsea - 7
?
You mean: Arsenal - 125 Chelsea - 7
?
Our only wingers really are Malouda and Zhirkov and I believe Zhirkovs best position is lwb aswell. Anelka and Kalou do get played on the wing but their original positiond are upfront and they dont seem to perform to well very often on the wing. I miss the good old days of Duff and Robben with Joe cole who could also play either side :wub:
Close ish,
Arsenal -125 Chelsea - 106
History is an ammount of time not how successfull a team is.
Close ish,
Arsenal -125 Chelsea - 106
History is an ammount of time not how successfull a team is.
I never understood why Chelsea let Cole go. I mean - he's better than Messi ffs!
Joe Cole is better than Lionel Messi, claims Liverpool's Steven Gerrard | Football | guardian.co.uk
---------- Post added at 02:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:12 PM ----------
Exactly. We were formed 125 years ago, you were formed in 2003
Actually:
Arsenal - 0
Chelsea - 0
Aston Villa - 1
Oh, sorry, thought we were talking about European Cups...