As an attacking midfielder, I'd go with average.
By calling him over-rated, I'm not calling him **** (aimed at Chelsea fans) - I just don't think he's one of the best midfielders around (much like I don't think Gerrard is) - he's not up there with Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane etc etc. Never the less, he's a good player, but as GC says, you could replace him with Hamsik/Moutinho etc. in ability wise however, replacing what he means to the club, is almost impossible - as impossible as replacing Gerrard & Carragher for what they symbolise.
I would never say he is up there with the likes of Xavi, Iniesta and Zidane etc because its quite clear he isent. Also Lampard is not an attaking midfielder and infact plays pretty ***** in attaking midfield. He likes to play alot deeper than that so he can have a choice of taking on the shot, playing a teamate in or spreading it wide where he can burst into the box late unmarked.
Saying that i dont think he is over-rated nor do i think Gerrard is over-rated. The way i look at it is both Lampard and Gerrard are past their best now, but when at their best they would have got into any side in the world and with good reason. When i say we cant replace him i mean the whole package, the goals, assists, leadership and sentimental value to Chelsea FC. But there are new players now and new ways of playing and that is the way around it.
---------- Post added at 02:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:58 AM ----------
Also reports are suggesting Boas wants Eto'o from Inter, they are keen to offload and would sell him for around 12million.
Last edited: