B
BlueHeart26
Guest
Good news. 3 free slots for 3 new players. Good call.
The Chelsea Thread
- Thread starter Ramires
- Start date
- Replies 35K
- Views 3M
Probably just because they are not good enough for a team wanting to retain Champions League crown and fight for Premier League.
I rate Malouda more than I do Kalou, Malouda just seems to of not got any form at all at Chelsea, but he is a great player, hence why he is consistently in the France National team. Maybe it is the formation that does not suit him, although lately he would have to be more of a Left Back under Di Matteo.
wonderkid360
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 2,157
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Who the **** are we going to buy to replace Drogba?
If I was Roman Abramovich I would be going for Falcao, but who knows.
wonderkid360
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 2,157
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Yeah,Falcao's good,but he would cost a lot,maybe £50m
Yeh but that has never stopped Roman getting who he has wanted before
The alternative option, probably a lot cheaper as well could be Cavani, although I think Falcao is quite a bit better.
Irish Scouse
Bob Kelso. ❥
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,986
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Is it true Chelsea had a £32m bid for Lucas Moura rejected?
Kalou will not be content with a place on the bench in my opinion. Not only that but he may fall even further behind in the pecking order due to the arrival of Marin and a new attacking midfielder which we are in for. Malouda on the other hand will not mind doing so, thats why I suspect Malouda is being re-signed
Mostly talk according to me, the Sao Paolo president did say we are the club 'closest' to Lucas Moura but I do not think he said we ever had a bid rejected for him
Why spend so much money on Falcao when we already have a very good striker and possibly one of the best youth prospects in the world on our books... especially when they are more pressing problems in other areas of then pitch. I agree Falcao is a great striker but we should stick with Torres who is nigh on unstoppable when on form and he has certainly showed that of late under Di Matteo
wonderkid360
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 2,157
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Yeh but that has never stopped Roman getting who he has wanted before
The alternative option, probably a lot cheaper as well could be Cavani, although I think Falcao is quite a bit better.
Well I suppose not...although it would be good if we signed a good Right-Back so we would still need some cash to sign one.But I do agree Falcao should be are No.1 choice.
I read yesterday that the President said they rejected a 40 million Euro's bid from Chelsea, and also said they were closest to signing him. Can't remember the source though, which is a shame.
Chelsea £32.4m bid for Lucas Moura rejected | Mail Online
ah, there is a different source, but has all the details in it.
ah, there is a different source, but has all the details in it.
Really? All I read was the President saying they had rejected a 20m bid from Inter Milan for his services last summer. All I read was him saying that Chelsea were 'closest' to signing Lucas Moura.
In any case, I hope we do not go for him. His price tag seems massively inflated for a person of his age and ability.
Very strange. I do not think he is saying the truth. Why would we bid 40m for Lucas Moura when we were not even prepared to bid the same amount for someone like Modric last summer
You bid £35m for Modric to be fair. But £40m for Moura is an insane offer.
Yes but we took that slowly. Who is the Sao Paolo President kidding anyways, he would bite off Roman's hand if he offered 40m for Lucas Moura. Its obviously a ploy to increase the hype around his player