Why on earth would Marco Reus leave one of the best Dortmund teams and one of the best current teams in Europe for Chelsea... rubbish article.
Is that why all I ever hear is your history chant and you even had a banner at anfield saying you had more history then us. Not to forget I have been targeted a number of times by your fans for supporting Chelsea.
What a disgrace Chelsea really are. They almost ruin Clattenburg's carrear and nobody at the club has the decency to apologise to the man. What a joke they really are. They have managed to instead of when people talk about Chelsea they talk about that champions league run they talk about Terry being racist, Cole showing to everyone how much of an idiot he really is, sacking RDM for no reason and to top it off accusing Clattenburg of racism because they were upset they lost the match. Like I said before. Disgrace.
It was Ramires who believed he heard Clattenburg say it. Surely not reporting it would have been worse than reporting it. Like i said yesterday i couldn't give a ***** if we are hated as we are used to it and if anything it spurs us on. Terry is also not a racist and if you don't like Cole then it's clear to see you put personal agenda before footballing ability.
It was Ramires who believed he heard Clattenburg say it. Surely not reporting it would have been worse than reporting it. Like i said yesterday i couldn't give a ***** if we are hated as we are used to it and if anything it spurs us on. Terry is also not a racist and if you don't like Cole then it's clear to see you put personal agenda before footballing ability.
Surely only reporting it if you had substantial evidence would have been better than reporting it from a player with limited English knowledge that the apparent verbal abuse wasn't aimed at?
The big issue was going public without fully backing up such claims. Maybe Ramires was certain in what he heard, but Chelsea clearly jumped the gun.
DarloGeorge96 said:What a disgrace Chelsea really are.
and to top it off accusing Clattenburg of racism because they were upset they lost the match.
We had to back Ramires the same way be backed Terry other wise that would be worse surely?
Not really. Terry didn't make the accusation, he was the accused. This time you were accusing someone else of being racist/making racist remarks without any proof, where as QPR had the video of Terry shouting at Anton (although obviously that's been and done now.) Ramires needed to be 100% sure of what was said, as the accusation made could (and might still) ruin someones career. He obviously wasn't.
Not really. Terry didn't make the accusation, he was the accused. This time you were accusing someone else of being racist/making racist remarks without any proof, where as QPR had the video of Terry shouting at Anton (although obviously that's been and done now.) Ramires needed to be 100% sure of what was said, as the accusation made could (and might still) ruin someones career. He obviously wasn't.
I was 99% sure Ramires got it all wrong. He doesnt even speak English. He's like Tevez.
I was 99% sure Ramires got it all wrong. He doesnt even speak English. He's like Tevez.
And this is why Chelsea shouldnt have gone forward with just that.
Well he must have been sure, for all we know he still might have said it.
Mikel, who was being spoken to by Clattenburg, was much closer than Ramires and did not hear what it is suggested was said to him.
The two assistant referees and the fourth official revealed they did not hear any of the comments Clattenburg was accused of making, despite being linked up to the referee via microphones.
Rammys English is better than Tevez's, a new born Puppy's English is better than Tevez's.
Mikel, from what I hear, has a better understanding of English than Ramires, and has been in the country much longer. That statement of:
Would imply that if Clattenburg had said something, if Ramires could hear it, surely Mikel could also have heard it.
Also:
So not only did Mikel not hear it, also the English speaking linesmen and fourth official did not hear it.
So in theory its 4 v 1, or even 5 v 1 if you include Clattenburg. The law of averages would suggest that it's more likely the 1 person is mistaken/lying, rather than the other 4 who all heard the same thing.
I agree, but what's done is done. Couldn't care less about Clattenburg's career though. The mug robbed us.