LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Well lets hope for a different outcome.... we could afford to sell to Chelsea, we cant afford to sell to Arsenal
The Liverpool Thread
- Thread starter Steve*
- Start date
- Replies 44K
- Views 3M
Well lets hope for a different outcome.... we could afford to sell to Chelsea, we cant afford to sell to Arsenal
I doubt Liverpool would consider selling to Arsenal unless they upped their bid, so you're pretty much fine at the moment, but if they offer around £50m, then Suárez is likely to leave - in my opinion, anyway.
epic terrorist
Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,009
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
After seeing the John W. Henry comments can't see liverpool selling now and tbf if they don't end up selling suarez good for them players have too much power as it is. With the Bale deal seeming to stall Madrid may still come in and I think he would be a better signing for them than Bale in my eyes abd him and Ronaldo in the same team would be frightening. I hope liverpool stick to their guns and make him stick around for this season at least they looked really good in the latter half of the season and for all his faults I'd rather have him in the premier league than not.
To be honest i think it is more Henry trying to force Suarez to hand in a transfer request, can not really seem him staying after everything Suarez has said as well as some Liverpool fans. Weather he comes to arsenal or not is anyone guess.
Well Liverpool have already broken the clause Suarez had in his contract. Clause said if minimum price of 40m is offered Liverpool must negotiate right price for sale of player. They rejected out of hand our bid of 40m + 1.
I thought that was only for Champions league teams and Liverpool argues were not technically a champions league team yet.
You mean Arsenal and yes we are. Qualifications are part of Champions league.
epic terrorist
Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,009
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
No even PFA chief Gordon Taylor states the clause doesn't say Liverpool have to sell, just that 40 mill + 1 means there can be discussions so if Liverpool don't want to sell they don't have too. All the power is with Liverpool given the time left on his contract I think they'll stick to their guns and keep him.
Have to agree to disagree on the qualification bit, i just think both parties are trying to save face and look like they are acting for the right reasons.
Liverpool haven't broken any clause, even the PFA chief mentioned it. It was a vague clause and one which means **** all.
Vague clause true, but if it says that if offer over minimum amount comes in then club must negotiate for sale of player in good faith.
Liverpool rejected our bid straight.
Probably they rate him very higher and think that 40 Million is nowhere good enough deal for them?
Especially after Cavani's and Falcao's went for 50m+ , but 40m is minimum price set into the contract and clause was triggered by offering above it which we did.
Eventhough 40m isn't enough for them if they wanted to do things right they wouldn't have rejected, but negotiated after our offer. They rejected it straight which means they broke the clause.
This looks like reading too much between the lines. The clause was when someone makes bid of 40 million Liverpool will let Suarez know which itself is a bs clause and nothing more.
No where it says club has to sell, yes it says parties will get around the table to discuss things and by the look of things discussion didn't end in Suarez favor.
That 40m and then inform the player is pretty much BS. Agents are informed if offers are made for their players anyway.
Parties never got around the table as Liverpool rejected it straight out of hand. ( = broke the clause )
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 5,908
- Reaction score
- 202
- Points
- 63
The head of the PFA has said Liverpool have done nothing wrong. End of argument
More good news... :L
BBC News - Liverpool's Raheem Sterling charged with assault
BBC News - Liverpool's Raheem Sterling charged with assault
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Arsenal are quite lucky Liverpool are not interested in reporting them... The one big problem in all of this is Pere Guardola, Luis' agent has got everything wrong so far, all the information he leaked to Arsenal has been all incorrect, Arsenal have been made look foolish with that 40mil and £1 bid. As Henry said:
"How does a club who doesn't have permission to speak with your player see his contract? It should have been confidential," Henry said. "Unfortunately it's the way it works in football. People don't speak about it publicly but that's the way it's run. It's how things are done. I don't think there's a point because it just seems to happen everywhere. It's rotten."
"How does a club who doesn't have permission to speak with your player see his contract? It should have been confidential," Henry said. "Unfortunately it's the way it works in football. People don't speak about it publicly but that's the way it's run. It's how things are done. I don't think there's a point because it just seems to happen everywhere. It's rotten."