Think it would be hard to argue packing the defence and sacrificing 'good' footballing for winning is a modern thing. Catenaccio happened, after all.
Whoa, no no no. I've been on this particular 'Pep is inflexible' horse for a loooong time now. There's very few instances of Pep ever compromising his ideals in his entire managerial history.
Weird thing is, despite playing against a side that deep, I don't think Rodgers really did change this season's philosophy. Liverpool still played like they were trying to exploit the space behind Chelsea, even when there wasn't any. Neville and Carragher did a great bit of analysis on it that I'll try and find.
That's not true at all. If Chelsea's deep defensive block worked THAT effectively then Jose wouldn't play anything else and they'd have gone the season unbeaten. I'll cede that the Coutinho move was an effective one, but I haven't said that Rodgers is incapable of influencing the game, just that he's rather dogmatic in sticking to his chosen philosophy. And even then, he's nowhere near Pep's level at that.
Certainly this is a criticism of Mourinho. Part of it can be put down to lack of striking options, but Mourinho teams have always has breaking other teams down as their weakest facet.