The Manchester United Thread
- Thread starter MisterStubbs
- Start date
- Replies 106K
- Views 6M
Who? Has Fergie seen this one play?
Nasri? We have seen him lot of times. Just a matter of whether he fits our tactics or not
On the other news Gibson:
"If Sunderlandget the three of us it would be unbelievable business," he said.
"It wouldn't faze me one bit to leave, all I want is what's best for me.
"So if the best thing for me is to leave and go somewhere that I'll play every week then so be it.
"I haven't sat down with Sir Alex to talk but if it comes to me not playing as much as I'd like next season I'll have to move.
"I'm nearly 24. I'm going to have to go somewhere else if I don't start playing regularly."
Nasri? We have seen him lot of times. Just a matter of whether he fits our tactics or not
On the other news Gibson:
Surprisingly not. 'Pato Rodriguez' - £10M.
fuelledbypassion
Complete Legend
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 3,437
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Oh I hope that's true, he looks like a really talented player. Hopefully that will mean were not in for Nasri too
markodragojevic
Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,755
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I never watched him except now a few clips on Youtube,**** he can dribble...@sunilvk7 he looks to small for CM
fuelledbypassion
Complete Legend
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 3,437
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think he's a natural attacking midfielder, but with all the qualities to be a quality winger. It would be very interesting to see if he is used in cm, as he doesn't appear o have the passing range of some of our reported targets.
Excellent deep regista, but shades of Pizarro in that he has a fair deal of bite in the tackle as well. Good player, I like him.
Just seen some interesting stats on twitter:
@R_o_M - Since 2006 City, Chelsea, Spurs and Liverpool have all spent more than United. We've won title 4 out of 5 years though
United have spent £164m since 2006. City have spent £456m. Liverpool £253m. Spurs £230m. Chelsea £200m. Villa £145m. Sunderland £122m.
@R_o_M - Since 2006 City, Chelsea, Spurs and Liverpool have all spent more than United. We've won title 4 out of 5 years though
United have spent £164m since 2006. City have spent £456m. Liverpool £253m. Spurs £230m. Chelsea £200m. Villa £145m. Sunderland £122m.
Ride The Walrus
A pretty cool guy.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 10,216
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Haha, Aaaand as soon as you put that...
"The back page of tomorrow's Daily Mail makes for interesting viewing - it basically says Man United's bid for Phil Jones is in tatters and that Liverpool have stepped in with a £22million offer."
Don't even want him anymore tbh.
Ahhh, Daily Fail at it's best.
Ride The Walrus
A pretty cool guy.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 10,216
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Sky Sports posted it, just thought I'd pass it on.
If you wanna pay 22million for a player who has already said he didnt join you, cause he wanted to win trophies, be my guests.
He's too small for a CM, and it'd be wasting his pace/dribbling skills.
fuelledbypassion
Complete Legend
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 3,437
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Paul Scholes?
You make an interesting point, but he's not strong enough, in my opinion, of course, to play center mid. We'll see I guess. Anyways, he plays in about an hour, I can probably get you a stream, if any of you feel like watching.
fuelledbypassion
Complete Legend
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 3,437
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think you are probably right, but I don't see why we would buy him to play in any other position? (especially if were signing Young, as they seem quite similar) Oh, I'd love a stream mate 