I can see where you're coming from on that one, but even the context of the league taken into account I still don't think he's as good. The aerial threat of the PL is somewhat overstated IMO.
The Manchester United Thread
- Thread starter MisterStubbs
- Start date
- Replies 106K
- Views 7M
I can see where you're coming from on that one, but even the context of the league taken into account I still don't think he's as good. The aerial threat of the PL is somewhat overstated IMO.
If we sign Austin I give up.
Only an anticlimax if you are obsessed with the big name.
You don't want to be that guy who is doing the essay the night before, stuck in the library doing research and trying to pull it altogether or you're ******. You want to be the one who has been working on it consistently for a while, can finish the work they have left with no pressure and can enjoy a nice cold pint whilst your peers scrabble around in panic.
I'm not and neither am i saying these are bad signings but all the billy big bollox talk from woody again, i suppose it's fans own faults for being naive in the hope we'd sign some top quality.
Austin would be terrible though, we've got cash to splash, mayaswell aim higher.
don't believe the hype. Fans always do this. Even bastian was a 4/10 chance when that started
Yup. And Wilson looked pretty good every time he played last season. Quick, direct, always looking for a shot, not afraid of running at defenders. Exactly what they would need. So lets loan him out. What is even going.
I just want a player who delivers. Two of our best players cost 13m and game from Moscow and Monaco
Even if Mane and Martial are good signings, don't see us getting any closer to the title or even the top 2.
wkdsoul
Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 11,014
- Reaction score
- 260
- Points
- 83
Teams still in the same position for me, decent first 12-15, rest is meh compared to City/Chelsea squad strength but that's about it.They'll still be 3rd-4th shoot out with Arsenal, and if Liverpool/Spurs can get there **** together.
Idk. We're not really thin on attacking options, just thin on quality attacking options. Rooney, Wilson, Depay, Young, Herrera, Mata, Valencia. Young and Valencia are the weak links there, but they are more about the "Cross to Felliani" tactic. While Wilson still needs to develop more.
I agree though. We should get 1 or 2 more in. Martial would be okay, but would prefer someone more experienced.
Also about something earlier. Martial costing £36million is a gamble for most teams. Not for Man Utd with the amount of money we can throw around. Even less so with a net spend of £0. Maybe even in profit with DDG sale.
Blazszczkowski off the top of my head.
Yeh but I wouldn't be convinced about him that he would.
If we did take a gamble mayswell throw cash at someone of higher calibre OR someone younger like Mauro Icardi from Inter who could be great eventually.
The season has barely started! City don't have the greatest squad strength in all areas. Namely central midfield and out wide. They've hit a hot streak, however I don't think it will last forever. Chelsea will get their **** together and Arsenal are just out of form and on a rare scoreless streak. United will challenge, provided as long as an alternative to Blind is found in central defence.
I
iNickStuff
Guest
He has always had money to spend. It was never an issue of not being able to afford players.
In this situation and context, we would probably see roughly similar. Only De Gea would not have been drawn out this long. Him nor Gill would never stand for it.
I don't think the exodus would be as big nor would we have signed two cm's.....
They have a good squad - Im worried he wont be playing a lot which is what he needs