steveorobbo
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- 192
- Points
- 63
Calm down.
No we shouldn't have signed him before Napoli. I'm glad we didn't. Yes, he isn't that good. He is good striker, any striker who scores 30 goals is good enough but his game is very limited. If you want ManUtd to spend so much money on a limited player then fine. For me he is not worth the money. Few weeks in and every one would be crying on how limited his game is.
Ibra wants 600K per week, if you believe that then you will believe anything that is reported. Also Higuain will be paid more than 200K per week and on top of that we have to pay 60 plus Million to sign him.
Ibra is better in every possible way and it's not even a contest.
Who said I believed it? I said "reported". But considering we do not have to pay for him, it would make sense for him to ask for an inflated wage on a short deal. If we dont pay that, and he's only arsed about his wage, he'll be on the first plane to China.
Of course Higuain would be paid £200k or more. Thats the going rate now at a top club for the best players. IF we signed Ibrahimovic and IF he is paid the REPORTED £600k a week, thats £21m a year (200k short) difference in wages between Higuain on £200k and Ibrahimovic on £600k. So on a 2 year contract for Ibrahimovic, the difference in wages would be the equivalent of paying £42m for him.
So yes, Id rather buy Higuain for £60m and pay him £200k a week on a 5 year deal, than get Ibrahimovic for free and pay him £600k for 2 years (equivalent of buying him for £42m and paying him £200k a week). Higuain works out £12m a season in transfer fee over the 5 years. Ibrahimovic would be on a short deal and in effect would work out at £21m a year in a transfer fee (difference in wage).
All if's and buts and speculation but you can see my point.