Would have perfect balance imo and offer everything. Best Midfield in the league if it happened.The engine room that never stops.
I can't see how you rate Kante without doing the same, he's basically a better version
He is a better CM than Carrick and Schweinstiger even though they perform different roles plus those 2 won't feature as much. And his passing is well underrated he is as a player imo. Defo better than Kante!I don't like Matuidi though, he is a jack of all trades and king of nothing player. Why do we even need him? What will he give us that Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Herrera, Carrick do not?
Just not a player we need, if I had a choice out of the two I'd go for Kante. Younger and proven in PL.
I don't like Matuidi though, he is a jack of all trades and king of nothing player. Why do we even need him? What will he give us that Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Herrera, Carrick do not?
Just not a player we need, if I had a choice out of the two I'd go for Kante. Younger and proven in PL.
I don't like Matuidi though, he is a jack of all trades and king of nothing player. Why do we even need him? What will he give us that Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Herrera, Carrick do not?
Just not a player we need, if I had a choice out of the two I'd go for Kante. Younger and proven in PL.
Matuidi is one of the best box-to-box around. He has the power and the technique to make it in both ends of the field. He's been vital to PSG. Our midfield does not have a powerhouse, that's partially why we are going all in for Pogba.
I agree with you about his age though, we already have experience in Carrick and Schweinsteiger. We should look for younger players.
I don't like Matuidi though, he is a jack of all trades and king of nothing player. Why do we even need him? What will he give us that Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Herrera, Carrick do not?
Just not a player we need, if I had a choice out of the two I'd go for Kante. Younger and proven in PL.
Also on the PL proven bit weren't you complaining a while ago how we wait until a player goes somewhere like Swansea and buy them for three times the price instead of taking the risk initially and signing them for less. You complain when we want PL proven players and when we want players who aren't.
Not quite understanding your point, Matuidi is coming from PSG at the age of 29 and Kante is 25, just as good, proven in a much stronger league.
Not quite understanding your point, Matuidi is coming from PSG at the age of 29 and Kante is 25, just as good, proven in a much stronger league.
He's got at least 5 years in him. Closest player matching his style is Nainggolan, and he's not moving. maybe Witsel, but he isn't as good.
Kante arrived a year ago unproven in the prem. It shouldn't impact a signing that much. Look at L'pool Bentke and Mingolet were prem proven, would you take either of them. De Gea wasn't prem proven would you replace him with anyone other than possibly Neuer.
Matudi has 44 caps for France a ton of silverware for his team and won the French player of the year award 2015. Kante arrived with none of that and did very well. Matudi has also played a ton of CL games, I think a player of his quality can cope with a slightly different league without a huge impact.
You could argue no key player in Leicester side that won the league was prem proven except Huth and they managed fine.
I think Matudi could just about cope with a different league
I don't even see the need for another box to box midfielder though, it's literally one of the last things we need. Even if Mourino has some whacky ideas this would be an odd signing. Plus we should be looking to build, we don't need another aging midfielder close to his 30's. Should of just gone for Krychowiak or Kante.
Schneiderlin was one of the best midfielders in Premier League before he came to us, we should focus on getting the most out of him.
Matuidi is way too hyped on here, he may be decent but he has never done anything great or been a part of anything great either for that matter. Unless we're all going to say Ligue 1 is great.