You say it as if I used Varane as my sole example, which I did not. Damola gave an example of Arsenal signing a young centre half (Holding) and throwing him into important games, I countered that with the simple fact of Mourinho signing a young centre half (Varane) and played him in big games, but because Mourinho signed the better player, and younger at the time too I may add, it somehow makes him less of a believer in youth in this particular situation?
Wenger has used his youth more than Mourinho, no question, but is he right to? Why should he get plaudits for it? He is managing the one of the supposed leading clubs in world football, not a secondary school, what has it done for him? Whilst Mourinho has been winning titles, with it has to be said fewer youth (but not non-existent!), Arsenal have been celebrating finishing above Spurs! Unless these youth players win him titles, then that "faith" in them instead of signing proven players which the club & fans deserve, could be perceived a little small minded & a sense of timidity, and many Arsenal fans I know feel that way.
Yes it does because as I said, any manager in the world would play Varane because he was already so good. Its like how Mourinho was trying to potray himself as a believer in youth because he played Arjen Robben when he was young despite the fact that Robben had already teared it up in the Dutch League. You can't really say a manager is a believer in youth when he is playing already world class players who just happen to be young.
Regarding your second paragraph, as I said above, whether its right or wrong for the club is another debate.


