The Manchester United Thread

Scouseinthehouse said:
How do you determine it's intentional?

When I initially saw it the pub before the Arsenal game, I thought exactly the same and was calling him worse than ***** and backing Zlatan for just elbowing him and not sparking him out. But then you see it again and the doubt comes in the more you watch it.

This is a great freeze frame. (Which also makes Rooney the complete lying so and so after what he tried to pull directly after the game. You where looking right at it right Wayne? Through those eyes in the back of your head like?).

View attachment 1108051

That's Mings explanation:

C6i1lxEU8AABA6C.jpg:large

Now you probably don't agree, but I just don't see how the FA can determine the intent to extend the ban by a further 2 games.
Click to expand...
He looks at zlatan twice before that..lol

Sent from my SM-G900T1 using Tapatalk
 
The club is getting fined for 'failing to control players' during the Chelsea game. XD
 
It's done on balance of probability. They would have looked at him staring twice and decided that he most likely knew what he was doing. And they are not going to call the police unless someone wants to press charges. Which pretty much never happens. Rugby players outright punch each other. No police. This idea of police being called in sport is largely overblown
 
Jose: "My players did what everybody saw on Monday. Tuesday 11:30 they were here training as great pros. That is the only thing I can say"

Regarding:
#MUFC boss Jose Mourinho on his players returning home from London at 4am on Tuesday morning.
​
 
Scouseinthehouse said:
How do you determine it's intentional?

When I initially saw it the pub before the Arsenal game, I thought exactly the same and was calling him worse than ***** and backing Zlatan for just elbowing him and not sparking him out. But then you see it again and the doubt comes in the more you watch it.

This is a great freeze frame. (Which also makes Rooney the complete lying so and so after what he tried to pull directly after the game. You where looking right at it right Wayne? Through those eyes in the back of your head like?).

View attachment 1108051

That's Mings explanation:

C6i1lxEU8AABA6C.jpg:large

Now you probably don't agree, but I just don't see how the FA can determine the intent to extend the ban by a further 2 games.
Click to expand...

If you look at the challenge in real time you can clearly see mings stamp down onto Zlatan's head. Mings' natural momentum when jumping over Zlatan would have had that foot landing a good half yard away from Zlatans head. You can clearly see him stamp down. He may not have intended to stamp on his head but I believe the stamp itself was intented. Just like Rojo's. You could see him clearly stamp down on to Hazard.

This is where our FA fails. So what if Oliver seen it? Can the ref not be wrong and be pulled up on it? The sooner TV ref's come into the game the better for me. Rojo IMO should be given at least a 3 game ban. Mings' was 5 maybe because it made contact with the head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top