Jamie, normally we agree on most things, but i disagree on your negative views.
In the last 8-10 years, there have been two thoughts on england, largely driven by ****** pundits and the Redtop media that seem to have become the general consensus. its a) we should knock over most teams easy cos we're Ingerland, or b) England are **** we will never amount to anything, the players arent that talented etc.
Neither are true, and it drives me up the wall. We're pretty decent nation, and for some reason cant see the middle ground its either one or the other. Very few people seem to want to step back and really analyse the situation, pundits and commentators would rather thrown out lazy one liners, ( yes Adrian Chiles in talking about you, you smug little ****)
People are so obsessed with what we arent that they cant see what we are. By and large, our players are agressive, and they are fit, right from Terry to Rooney up top, and because of the nature of the English game, they like to hound the ball. We are never going to to short game maestros, and frankly we dont need to , but we play a good medium game and have a core of players who can dictate the short game. Our own identity is staring us in the face. A semi counter-attacking aggressive pressing game relying on a midfield core that can play a short game and dictate the play through the middle, yet play the medium game down the flanks utilising the strengths of our fast pacy and dangerous intelligent flanks.
We need to stop lamenting that we arent someone else and play with what we are and realise we arent that bad, the soon er we do that the sooner we can actually get somewhere
I'm not saying play like Spain/Germany but we play kick and run football in the words of Beckenbauer and he's right...
I hate to side with the Germans on this but it is true, and they used to have their style of balanced rigid play but with the players like Ozil/Podolski/Mueller they adapted to play high tempo counter attacking football. England at International level have been well below par, the problem is something fundamental and it's the way players are brought through.
I hate being pessimistic, I have faith in the youngsters but if the systems broke then they are pretty much bound to fail from the get go. I never mentioned a problem with the physical stature of our players, that's fine and is what separates the Premier League from any other league in the world. I always support English players in the club circuit especially young ones, we have a unique system that produces Walcott's/Chamberlains over Sarabia's/Jimenez's and that is brilliant. The problem is the coaching and the fundemental fact that our players get coached to essentially 'stop the opposition' from early age groups (mainly under Pearce) rather than impose our quick, high tempo game on teams...
IF England get the right coach, with the right knowledge of the Premier League style, he can install a new modern philosophy of high tempo possession football based on overlapping widemen. That is why we differ from the Spaniards, we play high tempo every week and are built perfectly for it but what we lack is the coaching to put a system in place that imposes our better attributes on the opposition.
I liken England to Italy, two countries with so much potential but fail because their 'identity' at National level is outdated and not up to date with the Modern way.
We play kick and run and they play rigid 10 behind the ball bully the opposition into submission with defending.
Wilshere could be England's answer to Totti, a player who breaks the mould in a team full of people coached into the 'mould', or Wilshere could be the start of a new identity to the English team.
Either way the coaches there at the minute need throwing out and bring in specialist staff from the BPL, maybe make Hoddle U-21 coach with a young ex player as his assistant.
So many problems that lead up to match day performances it's ludicrous.
I often wonder what 'could be' right now if Scolari got hold of the team before he took over at Chelsea, and sadly I thin k we would be in a similar position.
Pearce has failed 3 times now is it?
I just don't see the sense in keeping him around, he hasn't helped any players to a great extent and his mindset is never going to help install a national philosophy. ''Winning mentality'' can't be picked up on if the coach is such an abysmal failure.
But yeah like I said, not all bad!
England/France/Italy are in similar positions.
It's just the French FA actually acted post South Africa whereas ours tied the coach up with a multi million pound contract so screwed themselves over before the tournament.
I'll turn on the England games again post Euros 2012 don't you worry, still support the players/country just not the system/manager/FA.
Edit: ''Euros 2010''? I know, think it was a typo. Fixed now.