Nahh that will not work, only the first match was 10-0, rest of them were 4-1, 3-0, 4-1
soo i guess your tactic itself is better
In football manager 2016 anything where you
win is a
success - if you expect 8-0 9-0 happening on a consistant level then you need to be an extremely good side - a regent side that are much better than the rest of your opponents and then you still should expect you won't win every game like that.
It would be wise to see
4-1 3-0 4-1 as a
success and then get
5-0 and
6-0 as a
rare event or a
sometimes event and even
more rare a
double digit - you cannot judge how good the tactics are if you expect big numbers only - you can also not judge a tactic on 3 matches you will need a big number here - something like
76+ with the
same players -
fully fluid -
high team cohesion - as often as possible
great morale - what you can do though is watch matches and see the tactics potential - make an estimation over the course of the many matches - did you deserve to lose did you deserve to win etc
If I play as Barcelona which I do becourse they are my team since the early 90's then I have clear expectations on what I expect from them when I test run a tactic - If they fail to succeed under those expectations I fail the tactic - I look at them visually 3d matches set to extended match with 2 notches above normal in speed I estimate -
How dangerous my team looks when they create chances -
How many of the shots that gets blocked -
How often the opponent get one on one with my goalkeeper - etc etc. If something feels wrong I either change or fail the tactic - If the opponent have been really dangerous on my third its a clear fail instantely if they have had 1 big chance and everything else has been pathetic I continue with that setup.
Statistically winning a match is usually a good thing, but if you struggle to do so and still win I would be worried - if you win with ease that's where you can estimate you have something.
If you play with an underdog team like lowest media prediction - success is a top position or even top mid depending on how bad your team is - in those cases you will get many defeats becourse the players quality is naturally low and will not be able to cope with most opponents - so success criterias here would be
ignoring how well the opponents play against you -
How much damange can you make over the course of a season to them and
finish in a
respectable position.
If you are trying to test new roles start a new save - don't use a personal save and don't use a regent save - 1st year is all that matters. Pick a team everyone else would pick to test stuff like Leicester or a 24th predicted team in the lowest league like Weston-super Mare
conclusion
don't fail something that
wins or something that looks
beautiful (potential).
Cheers mate