Some people may have just changed their avatar for a joke, but it also gets people thinking and raises awareness about these kind of things.
And also when the poll proved that at least 5 people are going to donate because of this. So just being stubborn isn't going to make your point anymore valid. Fair enough the OP didn't have a lot of rambling about the NSPCC because then I doubt it would have had 100 posts in an hour. 5 people are going to donate so if you can find someway of arguing that this is pointless and unhelpful I would love to hear it.Pass.
My point has been made, which was. People were just changing their avatar for the sake of changing their avatar. It may as well have been called the "lol lets look at old cartoons" thread.
I think this was conceeded when the OP was amended to include a donation link, and a poll about donating.
(K)
I care that he won't admit it has been worthwhile, when he categorically said it was a pointless and useless activity. Typical stubborn **** admin.Suprised this many people care that much about redders opinion tbh.
Sure there wasn't a link, but it was the way you went about it, trying to funny and take the **** out of what the OP had said.
How so?
I said the NSPCC would prefer donations.
Is that taking the **** of trying to be funny?
You're like some kind of new super 'tard.
How so?
I said the NSPCC would prefer donations.
Is that taking the **** of trying to be funny?
You're like some kind of new super 'tard.
How so?
I said the NSPCC would prefer donations.
Is that taking the **** of trying to be funny?
You're like some kind of new super 'tard.
No but it's a fun way of getting people on the thread and involved. Right?really, it makes no difference if people change their avatar or not...
the important thing here would be to donate, which Redders could do or not do if he wishes, regardless of his avatar