manutdforever90
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2013
- Messages
- 342
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
so youre suggesting to 'untick play narrow' and change WB to FB auto (both)..thats the tweaks, for the 3 new tacs in OP ?
Hmm.. Don't know if there are any changes in that 3 strikers. Download and see!
Yup, untick play narrower.
All right. What does the untick of "play narrower" does better, if I may ask?
so youre suggesting to 'untick play narrow' and change WB to FB auto (both)..thats the tweaks, for the 3 new tacs in OP ?
Yes! Good luck and let me know!
I'm using the 433 tweakino tactic and finished 5th last season (was decent for my players). This season I was too after 6 games with 6 wins and 0 goals conceded, I had a rival game which they beat me 2-1 and ever since I have been struggling to win a game and defence has been letting goals in left right and centre.
is there any tips to tighten it up using this tactic? I used to use the weaker foot etc OI but got too many cards so removed it last season. Should I scrap it in for the new V15 or has it got the same type of defending on that too?
I have set up OI but, come match day these doesn't show on the screen where the assistant manager is giving me advice.
It is still there. But it shows up when you click on 'show positions'. You set OI's to positions, not to players!
Good read! Thanks for this findings.. Anyone wanna back this up ? Logical to anyone ?I have now tried a new method.
I took the two formations (with the changes you said)
4-1-2-2-1
4-3-3
When you meet a formation with an attacking midterfield.
Like this:
View attachment 727505 View attachment 727506View attachment 727512
I used this formation 4-1-2-2-1 because it had a DEFENSIVE MIDT
When you meet a formation with an normal midterfield or defensive midt.
Like this:
View attachment 727514View attachment 727515
I used this formation 4-3-3 because we can press the middle more.
but if met this formation:
View attachment 727519
I play with this formation 4-1-2-2-1 because our winger follows their fullback back.
Here are the results:
Getafe result not your tactic.
version 15.2
Used the D-line method