DYJ

Am I the only 1 who keeps on conceding goals pretty much every game? Seems like every match is a struggle to over the line
 
attachment.php
attachment.php
 
Am I the only 1 who keeps on conceding goals pretty much every game? Seems like every match is a struggle to over the line

If you look at my Bournemouth side, they conceded goals just scored far more. This is because it's Bournemouth (who in real life conceded 70) and it's to be expected. The better the side the better the results. I did note form your screenshot you are 1st in the Bundesliga with Frankfurt though, which is still a decent achievement no?


Doing well in Serie A I see.

Chrissy, I'd like to to ask you about your transfer strategy. As you know, I'm Norwich, just up from the Championship. So obviously using the filters i dont get interested players at the default settings. What do you recommend reducing? The number of matching attributes or the attributes themselves? Do i want a master of a small number of attributes or a more average player all across the board?

Just keep reducing the values across the board until you get players. Aim to keep determination no lower than 13 and pace, acceleration, stamina and natural fitness no less than 11

In my team I have only AML and AMR, not ML nor MR, and I'm in November. What can I do until January?

Play the AML as a ML and AMR as a MR, they'll adapt and will be a square solution to the round question until the transfer window.
 
Everton has done it. Won the Premier League!

Year 1, used the 1st version of Fourfourtwo....leaked **** loads of goals. But came 2nd in the league luckily.

Year 2, used another tac, changed almost half of the team. Came 6th only

Year 3, almost didn't buy any new player, the old team finally gelled together. Only lost 2 games in the league. Didn't conceded many goals with the latest version of the tac.

Suggestion: If you buy and sold many players, its not going to work for a while. U will get some result but not excellent result. You need to do some Mentoring to make them gell to each other.

Each player I didn't spend more than 20m so that they are not the world beater kind of players. I bought only players Under 18 years old, and i sign them for 5 years contract with 3 years extension. So most of my players will work for me for almost 8 years with little wages.....

Yes i do like to sell all player aged 28 years old or more....as they are not going to play much longer, attributes fall, and get injured much easier.....but different manager plays diff games....

Thank you for such tac....
 
https://brokensjnf8ewhce8.com/topics/394-TESTED-Traditional-FourFourTwo-by-Chrissy-Dude/page-0.html
 
Everton has done it. Won the Premier League!

Year 3, almost didn't buy any new player, the old team finally gelled together. Only lost 2 games in the league. Didn't conceded many goals with the latest version of the tac.

Suggestion: If you buy and sold many players, its not going to work for a while. U will get some result but not excellent result. You need to do some Mentoring to make them gell to each other.
100% AGREE

Each player I didn't spend more than 20m so that they are not the world beater kind of players. I bought only players Under 18 years old, and i sign them for 5 years contract with 3 years extension. So most of my players will work for me for almost 8 years with little wages.....
LONG TERM PERFECT APPROACH, I DO SIMILAR

Yes i do like to sell all player aged 28 years old or more....as they are not going to play much longer, attributes fall, and get injured much easier.....but different manager plays diff games....

AGAIN SIMILAR TO ME


Thank you for such tac....

No worries dude.

https://brokensjnf8ewhce8.com/topics/394-TESTED-Traditional-FourFourTwo-by-Chrissy-Dude/page-0.html


cheers
 
Following on from Vitoco some tips for a long term save;

- Buy young sell old.
- Gear the club to youth development, develop young players as a philosophy.
- This then allows for the club to develop facilities, bring through young players on lower wages and the young players you sign from other clubs will generally be alot cheaper than senior players but do a similar job.


Case Study.

So to give you all an example, I am in my second season of my journeyman career. Won the title with Kilmarnock season one in Scotland, moved to take over a relegated Burnley season two. My aim from the start was to develop young players with an eye on the following year in the EPL. I basically did a massive overhaul, recruited using the filters but decided to go with retrained fullbacks at MR & ML for added defensive gains and because quite simply, these players have all the skills of wingers and the defensive attributes as well making them more rounded players. They both have the "get forward as much as possible" and runs with the ball down......" their respective sides. Ideal for wingers.

This overhauled side, comprising of mostly players under the age of 21 is storming the championship. Showing that if done right, you can effect massive changes to a team and get instant results. The key is to get them mentoring in good groups and have the determination level of all these players 14+ if possible. As you'll see alot of my signings have very high determination.


I shipped out older players, signed younger players and assigned players (ML & MR) to positions they wouldn't normally play to get them used to it (but didn't amend their personal training just played them in the position). The examples being Matt Lowton and Josh Tymon who I bought in. The idea is that my DR, MR & Sub 2 can play the DR/MR positions and the DL, ML & Sub 3 can play the DL/ML positions. So to keep the squad happy and increase versatility, 3 players cover these two positions. Also note the age of this team is very low, with only Taylor, Tarkowski and Lowton retained from not teenage existing club players.

The team line up, transfers and squad is shown below, as well as some screenshots of the MR and ML who are not natural to the position but I feel are much more capable than the existing wingers available. I reckon retraining attacking fullbacks in this manner for the traditional tactic is a game changer. Look at the numbers these guys are getting in their first few games. Lowton in particular an older player in the team and is adapting brilliantly to the new position and his training stats are improving as well which is rare in older players.

attachment.php


attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Fantastic info Chrissy. Whats your strategy for selling players? Never seem to get any kind of value when I try and sell
 
Fantastic info Chrissy. Whats your strategy for selling players? Never seem to get any kind of value when I try and sell

I am basically ruthless. Those that I can't use I sell/loan out/ put in the reserves and I normally find come the next window they are all gone or on long term loan.

In terms of value, I probably don't get much tbh. It's only after using the tactic for a year or so that hefty bids come in for players and then I just wait until they hit a value I am comfortable with and I have a replacement in place or lined up.

Avoid "minimum fees" on contracts unless you can get them to a level you want. If players start demanding a low set fee, they are out on their **** pronto.

My mate Guido has a great blog on sales that is worth referencing;
https://strikerless.com/2017/03/01/transfers-using-league-reputation-to-your-advantage/#more-5431
 
this tactic is a **** cheat, almost impossible to lose with it.

it just gives another proof that TFF's 75 Siblings testing is not really trustworth, am really surprised that this one is not somewhere on the first position in those tests :o.
 
what is the best the traditional four four two or the four four two tactic?
 
this tactic is a **** cheat, almost impossible to lose with it.

it just gives another proof that TFF's 75 Siblings testing is not really trustworth, am really surprised that this one is not somewhere on the first position in those tests :o.

Because there's multiple evidence that FMarena results are based on very small and insignificant size of samples. Also design that every team has same squad with just different reputation is unrealistic compared to any other competitions on the earth. Also players on the testing team has stats more suitable for certain roles.
 
this tactic is a **** cheat, almost impossible to lose with it.

it just gives another proof that TFF's 75 Siblings testing is not really trustworth, am really surprised that this one is not somewhere on the first position in those tests :o.

They probably aren't following the instructions tbf

what is the best the traditional four four two or the four four two tactic?

I reckon traditional.

Because there's multiple evidence that FMarena results are based on very small and insignificant size of samples. Also design that every team has same squad with just different reputation is unrealistic compared to any other competitions on the earth. Also players on the testing team has stats more suitable for certain roles.

They at least try, kudos to them for that.

Hi, witch tactic?

Traditional fourFourTwo

Is the best?

It's certainly getting decent results both in testing for myself and other people.
 
Back
Top