LOL. chelsea reject hope he gets game time this season or will be waste of tallent imo.
His poor first touch almost leads to a goal conceded
LOL. chelsea reject hope he gets game time this season or will be waste of tallent imo.
Can see him leaving if he does not get game time this season.His poor first touch almost leads to a goal conceded
Yeah has been more goal threat since, OMG henderson on now:SBelgium have been better since Lukaku came on, putting a little pressure on the England defense although they have had less possession since.
Agree think it will be like this under hodgson may get better after more time in job and more games together, would happily go to euros beeing hard to beat not like that **** we watched against germany debacle.same as Norway game, solid enough defensively (without being under much pressure) but pretty poor going forward
Agree hazard was poor and lukaku gave them better penetration, was happy with england performance just need to keep ball better but that will come i think.Belgium looked much better when Lukaku came on. He gave them that extra penetration which they lacked all through the first-half. Hazard-Lukaku-Fellaini combined well at times.
England defended deep with two banks of 4 and took their chances when it came. Good performance in my opinion. Hopefully Cahill and Gerrard are fit though
Agree hazard was poor and lukaku gave them better penetration, was happy with england performance just need to keep ball better but that will come i think.
Hazard was poor? In what world. He was the best Belgian player on the pitch
Disagree dembele was imo, hazard could not do much against england defending deep but will have to get use to that playing in prem against lesser teams.Hazard was poor? In what world. He was the best Belgian player on the pitch
Yeah dembele looks quality be suprised if still at fulham next season!He was hardly poor but not great either. Did he even misplace a pass?
Dembele just oozes quality. Despite losing possession for the first goal, thought he was the best player on the pitch.
Dembele and Fellaini were the best Belgian players, err Fellaini was the best player in the match. Should have been motm.
Disagree dembele was imo, hazard could not do much against england defending deep but will have to get use to that playing in prem against lesser teams.
Feel sorry for lukaku great tallent not played much could be wasted if does not get playing time did well when came on today tho.Dembele's mistake for England's goal puts a damper on things. Fellaini was good imo but to say Hazard was poor is not true. He moved the ball well and did well to set up the few chances Belgian had. Anyways considering how Belgian lacked end product and penetration despite their possession, Lukaku should have played from the start
Yep will play better with better players looking forward to watching him next seas, might take while to adjust but should be okay.Think he will do much better with players like Mata around him. Could not do much but was hardly poor.
He was hardly poor but not great either. Did he even misplace a pass?
Dembele just oozes quality. Despite losing possession for the first goal, thought he was the best player on the pitch.
Dembele's mistake for England's goal puts a damper on things. Fellaini was good imo but to say Hazard was poor is not true. He moved the ball well and did well to set up the few chances Belgian had. Anyways considering how Belgian lacked end product and penetration despite their possession, Lukaku should have played from the start