I don't know what that first line means.
So the 16 other people who agreed with me are ignorant too? He hasn't proven himself to be as good as the other 3 IMO and I've already explained why in detail, using an actual methodology for how I rate managers rather than just saying "He wins trophies so he's the best!"
No, I didn't. I said that from the perspective of someone who thinks diving is a part of the game, Masch did his job very well. It was a horrible act and poor sportsmanship, but he's that type of player and I've never really been a fan of him. Don't know why he's the captain of the Argentine national team, he's not a good sportsman: a dirty player and a diver. I always liked Cambiasso and Gago more.
Because you go on and on about how evil Barca is and don't say anything about Madrid, and you claimed over and over again that Barca is way worse than Madrid, which they aren't. Pedro, Busquets, and Alves are all pretty bad, but they certainly aren't in a class of their own. They're not as bad as Ronaldo, Di Maria, Nani, etc. Barca crowded the ref a lot that game, and Pique does it a lot, but that happens all of the time in football. Last year it was the typical Germans and now this year it's Barca, but it's something you see in every league in every game. Diving is as well. More importantly, you hate Barca more than anyone I've seen, and claim it's because they dive, but that's obviously not true because there are so many divers out there yet you aren't bothered by it, but when Barca does it you go apeshit.
Again you've made it clear you hate Barca more than anyone on the forum, and most people who frequently watch La Liga don't think that either team is better than the other.
So Moyes is a ****** manager, isn't he? And Mancini is a great one? Unai Emery must be worthless also. And Hiddink...I mean, that guy never won the World Cup, he must be terrible! Oh, and Pep Guardiola must be the best in the world since he won the treble in his first season.
Again you completely twist my words. I never blamed him, I simply said it's a very important part of being a manager that he hasn't proven himself in. Ferguson, Wenger, etc. have proven themselves in this regard, which is why he isn't on their level (yet).
First of all, read up on Hiddink, he has managed many clubs throughout his lifetime and has proven his worth as a club manager. Even if he didn't, why shouldn't he be taken into account? He has done things that no other manager could do on a consistent basis...taking S. Korea to the semi-finals, taking Australia to the knockout rounds (only to lose on a bullshit penalty in stoppage time to Italy), having a great Euro with Russia, etc. Unlike managers who only take jobs with great teams where they know they can only build their reputations bar utter failure (Mourinho), Hiddink takes the riskiest positions. He takes teams with no talent, history, or experience and actually wins with them. But he does more than just that and has proven that he can win trophies too.
I never said Hiddink was a bad manager and as a Chelsea fan i think quite the opposite. But he has built his reputation as a national manager so i put him in a different catagory.
