Kallemannen & ChristianEriksen - Ultimate 4231

Kallemannen

A few things

(1) I am not claiming that i am a tactical genius or better than anyone on this forum

(2) In my opinion, i feel i have improved the original tactic, this is based on my own results and other peoples feedback and results. This is not because i think am an FM god or anything like what you are claiming i think i am.

(3) i dont play my "tweak" as plug and play.

(4) Can we get back on topic please b4 this gets out of hand ? :)

yes there is no more to discuss. I disagree strongly with (2) but lets discuss no more
I will take a step back here cause its obvious that I caused this to get "out of hand"

Its just me when I get irritated, dont take it personal cause its not aimed towards you, its as I said, more a thing about how people view tactics.

So yeah, ill actually even throw in a "im sorry" here, sorry Allan
actually you have been holding this tactic thread alive with your posts and contributed to the tactic

So im off this thread now.. but not only cause of this but I got a new 4-2-3-1 coming up
Cheers
 
yes there is no more to discuss. I disagree strongly with (2) but lets discuss no more
I will take a step back here cause its obvious that I caused this to get "out of hand"

Its just me when I get irritated, dont take it personal cause its not aimed towards you, its as I said, more a thing about how people view tactics.

So yeah, ill actually even throw in a "im sorry" here, sorry Allan
actually you have been holding this tactic thread alive with your posts and contributed to the tactic

So im off this thread now.. but not only cause of this but I got a new 4-2-3-1 coming up
Cheers

Look fella, i understand that FM tactics take a lot of work, believe me i am aware of this. Maybe my comment did come across wrong so i appologise for that and dont worry i havent taken your comments personally at all hence why i have been "trying" to defuse the situation. I felt it was just a misunderstanding due to language barriers. As you've mentioned, in text a lot of things written can easily be mis understood.

But please don't feel like i am trying to take away anything from you at all as that has never been my intention. But good luck with your new tactic :)
 
Tried the 2 tactics, using FMRTE to get them fully fluid, same match
1-1 with Allans tweak and 2-0 with original

Didnt notice any difference at all tbh
Its different from match to match and a 1 match test says nothing

If I am to say something, the tweak seems to have gained a bit in attack but lost just that little in defence, but as said, 1 game

Lille vs Napoli ( I was napoli)
Almost lost with the tweak, equalised on a corner in 80 minute
Did however dominate stats

Not aiming to start a fight here again. I liked that Allan brought life into the AMC, which actually seems to perform better
Although, I cant see someone going unbeaten 2 seasons with this, I was 10 minutes from getting beaten with a much stronger napoli side...

But of course, Allan doesnt plug and play, but I initally though we compared the 2 tactics, as plug and play?
Since that is what most people do.
But with that said, I can absolutley see Allan go unbeaten with in game tweaks of course.
 
Last edited:
tactic is pants anyway lol

Its not a plug and play m8 so it will only do well if you adapt to the team you play against. At least thats the way i have had loads of success with it anyway
 
just let it go now you are coming off as bitter

Its a free world and I can discuss what I want right, especially in my own thread?
Tend to your own business mate

And yes this was a bitter reply to your post, but do you think I care?
Now ****** off :)
 
Its not a plug and play m8 so it will only do well if you adapt to the team you play against. At least thats the way i have had loads of success with it anyway

Of course, and then I think our "battle" has been a bit of a misunderstanding
I thought you plugged and played, like most people who use other peoples tactic, but now that you seem to be a good FM player, there is no comparing the tactics anymore and so.. well I will let it go now, the tactics play the same

Now I just ask, what OI do you people here use?


i remember posting some new OI while back but cant find them
 
Its a free world and I can discuss what I want right, especially in my own thread?
Tend to your own business mate

And yes this was a bitter reply to your post, but do you think I care?
Now ****** off :)
awwwwwwwwwwwww nice
 
That is exactly what i do m8. Basically, im not creating chances within 5 mins, its tweakin time !!!


Can you give some typical examples on tweaks you launch in-game, Allan.

Regards, curious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Can you give some typical examples on tweaks you launch in-game, Allan.

Regards, curious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For example, if i am playing a team thats using 4-4-2, i see if i can get any luck with playing wide or narrow, if i dont get anything from either of those, ill then try playing through the middle or the flanks. That kind of thing.

Another example, if i am playing away from home, sometimes using "be more disciplined" works and vice versa at home using "expressive" does. Obviously this isnt set in stone. it WILL differ from team to team based upon manager tendencies, formation, players etc. Same also goes for playing bigger teams (disciplined) and lesser teams (expressive).

If you want to defend a lead, sometimes "stick to positions" can be a help.

Dont be afraid to experiment tho, thats how i get the better results. Check some of the screenies i have posted on this thread to see what i have been getting
 
Last edited:
Any solution for the average playing AMC position? can't make him play well no matter what i do...
 
Its not a plug and play m8 so it will only do well if you adapt to the team you play against. At least thats the way i have had loads of success with it anyway
I was only joking, sorry.
 
Back
Top