Lampard this year, prob bout equal ability imo. Both are different players.
Not that it makes a difference for England as stevie g will be captain at world cup so will definately play.
Lampard. It's not even a question. More goals, more assists. They're they only things that matter.
It is a question,that's why the thread was made? oO)
But you may always say this because you're a Chelsea fan.
Had he stuck with West Ham or gone to Arsenal or even Manchester United,then I'm sure that quite a few people's opinions would have changed.
If he moved to any other club than Chelsea, he'd get the recognition he deserves.
If you play for Chelsea, you're hated, simple.
You say I'm just saying it because I'm a Chelsea fan, I could say, you're saying it because you hate Chelsea.
but i hate Chelsea and Liverpool lol i still say Gerrard is better
If he moved to any other club than Chelsea, he'd get the recognition he deserves.
If you play for Chelsea, you're hated, simple.
You say I'm just saying it because I'm a Chelsea fan, I could say, you're saying it because you hate Chelsea.
Very difficult... Lampard is a better controlling midfielder for me -- as in he can dictate the pace of a game better. His all-round game is excellent too. Though Stevie Gerrard, when pushed further forward or given a licence to attack is ****** immense. In terms of England, I'd play Lampard in the middle of midfield and give Gerrard a free-role to link with Rooney.
this. gerrard is more direct, but lampard is better for retaining possession.In short, Gerrard is the better all round player of the two but Lampard is the more effective player.
I'd much rather have Lampard in my team over Gerrard. Scores more, creates more, more consistant, never injured.
Simple.
Both better at different things. Lamps obvs scores more goals (tho most are pens which is misleading) and has more assists but I think overall Gerrard is better. This season Lampard has defo been better but I still stand by my eariler point. This season Gerrard hasn't been able to play like Lampard and get forward as much because Gerrard has to come deep to get the ball because there is no Alonso to give it to him. 1 way of seeing which one is better is by saying which would be missed more. Would Chelsea miss Lampard more than Liverpool would miss Gerrard? I think Liverpool would miss Gerrard more than Chelsea would miss Lampard.
alright my bad about what I said about penalties. I was just saying if most of his goals came from penalties then his scoring stats would be misleading. Mr Chelsea could I ask where you got that info from? I'm not saying I don't believe you I'm just interested. From my previous point Lampard is able to stay forward more so I believe that's why he scores more than Gerrard
Carrick