Jack Fulham
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,850
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Not the best time to start comparing them again considering Gerrard is yet to play to this season.
Not the best time to start comparing them again considering Gerrard is yet to play to this season.
That would be very stupid, you can compare them overall though and for me Gerrard is proberly the better footballer but the goals, assists and medals all point towards Lampard.
I think if you'd look back on there careers in 10 years time, you'd describe Lampard as an goal scoring midfielder and Gerrard as an all action midfielder. Lampard has had the luxury of playing in the hole most of his career with two quality midfielders behind him with more defensive duties. Gerrard on the other hand hasn't had this throughout his career but when he did in 07-08 and 08-09 with Alonso and Mascherano behind him, he out scored Lampard in both season's. However, Gerrard did make 12 more appearances than Lampard in 07-08 and scored 1 more goal than him. Gerrard's assists are no where near as good as Lampard's. Both players are spectacular and stats wise Lampard wins hands down. However, I've never seen Lampard put in a performance like say, Gerrard vs AC Milan in the 2005. I'd say Gerrard all round game is a lot better where as Lampard is just a far more effective footballer in general. I'd love to say Lampard is better but Steven Gerrard for Liverpool against Fulham in the 08-09 season was one of the best live games I'd ever seen. Although the stats point towards Lampard, I've always found Gerrard are much more exciting player.
I know where your comming from about the whole AC Milan type performance from Gerrard but how many players in the world game have put in performances like that?? Not many, in the big games for Chelsea Lampard does turn up especially in finals or in title winning games. Im not personly saying Lamps is better because in some aspects i think Gerrard is better but it annoys me when people say all Lampard does is score penalties, tap ins and deflected shots.
Gerrard is better player, but Lampard achieved lot in his career (Reason being played for better team). Lampard is top professional, rare Chelsea player whom I respect a lot, but given the choice I would choose Gerrard.
He is a ****, hypocrite but terrific player. Also he is very good defensively and equally good at attacking. Adding to that he is one of the most versatile players in the league, Europe.
Keep your opinionated bile to yourself son. Criticise Stevie by all means from a playing standpoint but that was a vile personal attack. Engage your brain before you post in such stuff or keep it to your own club threads where the risk of causing offense is minimised.
I can't judge them or compare them at all.
Gerrard is more rounded, can dictate the game and hit a pass on a 50p coin.
But Lampard gives you guaranteed goals and drive from the midfield, which Gerrard gives as well but not in such a high amount.
If you were asking me as Real Madrid manager who would I rather buy it would be Gerrard but if you were asking me as Manchester United manager I would say Lampard.
That sit-on-the-fence explanation seems to have been sufficiently not-explained, in fact you're probably more confused after reading that than you were before but there you go that's my view.