No, he's served 9 months, he still has 9 months on license, 3 months on a tag and 2 years of probation
So he has served his Jail Sentence, As i said before it is not un heard of for people not to serve the full time. He has clearly shown signs of improvement and good behaviour to be given an early release.
Plenty of offenders come back to society and CANNOT get a job, (including ME) not because 'of rules' but because people are bias, why should he be any different? Then you have the fact that most jobs involving children have to be Criminal Record checked, even if your crime didn't involve children, violence or sexual offences. His crime fits 2 of these criteria! My crime fits none of the criteria and it stopped me working in a football stadium.
So becuase you or other offenders couldnt get a job, King shouldnt also. A bit Bitter really. There is a bias attidude in this country, Illustrated in this thread. He can also not work with children. But he has a talent a trade, in football which he is skilled in. It is no different to if you where a skilled and talented brick layer, You can get a job in brick laying, The fact he is a skilled footballer, doesnt mean he should not be allowed to work his trade.
What exactly are you trying to say here? That Olympic rules are more serious than British Law, or that Chambers got off lightly?
King broke the law, and has done his time. Why should football punish him. It is similar to chambers, as he broke an olmpic rule, He didnt get punished by another organisation. He played American Football during his 2 year ban. So the organisation that is this countrys government has punished King through the court, so why should another organisation in football punish him aswell.