Most Comprehensive Tactic Test in FM-Base History

[Mr Langvatn]

Good job mate. TFF's 442 seems to be very solid! Top of all test it's in so far.
How about date442 with it's original OI? I had better result with the OI on TFF and Will's test save.

I tested Date with and without OI's in the last database, and the results were inconclusive really, but it got more points without OI's. I don't think there is much of a difference though.

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Is it possible to test a tactic which is composed of a home and away version?

Sorry, we don't do that.

 

[TMHaraldsen]

Whats the ETA on the new spreadsheet?

 

[Martino]

http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/share-download-fm-16-tactics/357930-raumdeuterparty.html

Any chance you can test this tactic?

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Whats the ETA on the new spreadsheet?

My guess is today

 

[Mr Langvatn]

http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/share-download-fm-16-tactics/357930-raumdeuterparty.html

Any chance you can test this tactic?

It's already tested I think Lucio will make the public spreadsheet today.

 

[dimartino]

Just a small suggestion: freeze the first column (the one with the tactic name) so we can still see it when scrolling across the sheet.

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Just a small suggestion: freeze the first column (the one with the tactic name) so we can still see it when scrolling across the sheet.

That won't be necessary for this sheet. It won't have as many details, so no need to scroll.

 

[Martino]

It's already tested I think Lucio will make the public spreadsheet today.

Ah ok. It's just that the new version 2 performs better than the original version. At least in my tests.

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Jesaustralia wanted to test top team tactics, so we will make a separate tab for him to be in charge of in the spreadsheet. So, we will have one underdog test with 180 matches tested per tactic, and one top team test with 180 matches tested per tactic

 

[vujevic]

INVERTED tactic V-16.4-by Meraklija Vujevic_62CCA0F1-950D-409C-93A0-22A37E7D56A1

can you test

nice job done

 

[TMHaraldsen]

Gief spreadsheet!

 

[Lucho616]

OP Updated!

New Test and New Testing results table here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZsV3tncJggYWV_sHhA7CT7nlz5F3SB-yPFSHjhYtxGk/edit?usp=sharing

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Note to everyone reading the spreadsheet:

You should not look at the results from the CA120 and the CA145 tables individually, as they are much less accurate than the overall table (90 vs 180 matches)

 

[Lewisboo]

Any chance to test PUSKAS II ?

http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/share-download-fm-16-tactics/357593-tribute-ferenc-puskas.html

 

[Martino]

OP Updated!

New Test and New Testing results table here:
Ø
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZsV3tncJggYWV_sHhA7CT7nlz5F3SB-yPFSHjhYtxGk/edit?usp=sharing

hey lucho, did you test version 1 or 2 of the Raumdeuter party?

 

[ChristianEriksen]

Thanks a lot for the test(ing time). ^^)

 

[Jesseh]

hey lucho, did you test version 1 or 2 of the Raumdeuter party?

It was version 1. I will test v2 when there is time

 

[Lykaon]

TFF-Conqueror(with man marking)

Hello Mr Langvath,

In my personal saves i havent seen any tactic tht performed superior to Conquerer(v5) or(v9).
Of course in a normal save there is tons of RNG factors that masks real quality of the tactic. Do you guys mind testing this tactic but with setting man marking? Or its impossible to make such test with man marking ?

Best Regards,

 

[Mr Langvatn]

Hello Mr Langvath,

In my personal saves i havent seen any tactic tht performed superior to Conquerer(v5) or(v9).
Of course in a normal save there is tons of RNG factors that masks real quality of the tactic. Do you guys mind testing this tactic but with setting man marking? Or its impossible to make such test with man marking ?

Best Regards,

If man marking works with simulate match it should work as long as it is pre-set in the tactic (saved in the role).