I gave Chinese 343 strikerless a go with Liverpool and the results are quite average :S
I also can't make Chinese 343 strikerless work
the defense looks good but the attack is weak
Tactics from differant forums {around the world}
- Thread starter cragswfc
- Start date
- Replies 2K
- Views 2M
I also can't make Chinese 343 strikerless work
the defense looks good but the attack is weak
Xlapatsas10
Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
- Messages
- 375
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I am waiting....hope to be next
I also can't make Chinese 343 strikerless work
the defense looks good but the attack is weak
I holiday tested first season with Bournemouth (no signings) and came second only 3 points behind Man Utd.
=jOaO lUiS=
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2008
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Hi 
Can you please provide the original topic link for Chinese 343?
Or else, the OI's please
Can you please provide the original topic link for Chinese 343?
Or else, the OI's please
Aggressor test.
6 clear
5 half chances.
Lloris A.K.A the son of Zeus. He played with 8.5 rating oO)
BTW what a domination..
View attachment 98660
6 clear
5 half chances.
Lloris A.K.A the son of Zeus. He played with 8.5 rating oO)
BTW what a domination..
View attachment 98660
No OI bro.
Mr L Tactics - Chinese 343 strikerless
Mr L Tactics - Chinese 343 strikerless
Hi
Can you please provide the original topic link for Chinese 343?
Or else, the OI's please
lollazo.
but the year is 2024. You should have top squad 8-|
but the year is 2024. You should have top squad 8-|
First champions league group game
keanurefresh
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2014
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
What is the training, please
They also won the EFL Cup, Max Gradel won all the player of the year awards and my assistant won manager of the year. I literally did nothing but plug in the Chinese 343 strikerless and went on holiday.
To be honest, any kind of tactic test without standardazing the consistency, important match attributes and removing all injuries chances will never produce results accurate enough to differentiate a good tactic with another good tactic. Even with the standardization it needs at least four or more seasons to be tested to have a somewhat good accuracy.
Testing a tactic without standardization and only one season and gave conclusion on that is simply irresponsible to the tactic author.
Testing a tactic without standardization and only one season and gave conclusion on that is simply irresponsible to the tactic author.
On my PC it takes about 25 minutes to check what you said
I did as you said:
- I started a new game
- I picked Bournemouth
- I plugged Chinese 343 Strikerless
- I went on holiday until the end of the season
And as I expected no miracle happened…
I just don't understand... Why did you said that? Did you just want that someone test the tactic for you? Dude, it's not cool...
View attachment 98646
View attachment 98645
View attachment 98644
View attachment 98643
Had to revert to a backup (2 games before end of season) so ended up 3rd not 2nd because I accidentally saved over the original, but heres the proof. How else would the AssMan win manager of the year?
View attachment 98642
View attachment 98641
Pal, unfortunately, it's typical behavior for many people here, they find a tactic that seems interesting to them and of course, they desperately want to find out how it works but often they just don't have time to play FM and the only way for them to find out how it work is to make other people to test the tactic for them so they come here and post something like this: "OMG! WOW! I've found an amazing tactic! I won everything with it! THE BEST TACTIC EVER" and also often in order to get more attention they post few screenshots with amazing results that was made by using in-editors or saving/reloading...