***THE BETTER HALFS TACTIC UPLOAD & DISCUSSION

Who do you sub off if you get a red card?

It depends on the score in the game and the opponents formation.

Sometimes, if the opponent is flooding the midfield, I don't use a AML but instead, I put the AMC into AMCleft and the DL in WBL.
Sometimes, I don't use a DMC but instead drop down the AMC into MCleft.
Sometimes, If the opponent play really attacking and pushes up, I use a 451 with MC, MC, AML, AMR and drop the mentality of the pushed up DMC so it's the same as the MCRight

All this is with the " normal" formation so if using the "mirrored", AML means AMR , DL means DR etc.
 
Hello TBH
Sorry if I insist much on this topic, but this tactic I love it! So I would be able to play it as close as possible to your also using the Tactic Creator
Below I am attaching a screen with the tactics, which includes role-players and team instructions
I would like to, please, that I gave him a look and tell me if the roles are correct and isrtuzioni team are close to those of your tactics
Ringranzio you very much!
View attachment 300871
 
there you go mate



Thanks. Did you notice a change in the build up during this game? That you initially attacked on the MR-MC flank and when they tried to get back in the game, the AML-DMC flank was used in the build up and then when they gave up, that the more probing MR_MC flank was used again in the build up ( not where the goals were scored from, but the build up) ?
 
Hello TBH
Sorry if I insist much on this topic, but this tactic I love it! So I would be able to play it as close as possible to your also using the Tactic Creator
Below I am attaching a screen with the tactics, which includes role-players and team instructions
I would like to, please, that I gave him a look and tell me if the roles are correct and isrtuzioni team are close to those of your tactics
Ringranzio you very much!
View attachment 300871

they are pretty close. Mind you, I would use the DMC on support. If you want to see how the roles are changed from the ones in my tactic, just download the FMC/TC version. You will see that many sliders have been tweaked so I don't know if that will work for you

Also , use. " press more"
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Did you notice a change in the build up during this game? That you initially attacked on the MR-MC flank and when they tried to get back in the game, the AML-DMC flank was used in the build up and then when they gave up, that the more probing MR_MC flank was used again in the build up ( not where the goals were scored from, but the build up) ?
i dont paying attention on that but i can tell you that build up is realy realy good (how they defend, attack)
 
View attachment 300876View attachment 300877View attachment 300878View attachment 300879

very good tactic, this year only expected to be a transition year, sold a lot of players who were above 30 years and hired some very young players, and I must say very well mated to the tactic, the only player who does not perform with this tactic is Cisse, I do not understand, Ba or Ameobi do very well in that position, just cisse not performing in that position, I must say it is excellent defensively, Cheers!
 
View attachment 300876View attachment 300877View attachment 300878View attachment 300879

very good tactic, this year only expected to be a transition year, sold a lot of players who were above 30 years and hired some very young players, and I must say very well mated to the tactic, the only player who does not perform with this tactic is Cisse, I do not understand, Ba or Ameobi do very well in that position, just cisse not performing in that position, I must say it is excellent defensively, Cheers!

great start to the season. Apart from the fact that Cisse might be getting frustrated with not scoring, the initial problem might be his PPMs . He likes to beat the offside trap and tries first time shots . This means that he will act more like a poacher am don't get involved in the build up, not linking up with play. My favourite PPms are " plays one-twos"
 
first year with Parma per i got 3th the team was very solid and played a good football, but second year i'm having a lot of problem team doesn't play well and i got a lot of draws. why? my team is stronger than first year!
 
first year with Parma per i got 3th the team was very solid and played a good football, but second year i'm having a lot of problem team doesn't play well and i got a lot of draws. why? my team is stronger than first year!

could be down to many reasons.

Have you brought in lots Of new players, have they settled yet? These signings , how are are their mental stats compared to the ones they have replaced

Have you changed captain ? Have the fixture list been harder, the players starting to loose out in confidence. How are you handling your coaching/man handling now that things are tougher , can the players cope with the pressure etc
 
I decide to play with Napoli,what plug and play tactic i must choose from 1 page,and which players i musy buy in 1 season...Sory for my english...
 
I decide to play with Napoli,what plug and play tactic i must choose from 1 page,and which players i musy buy in 1 season...Sory for my english...

That would depend on your signings :) and the signings would depend on your transfers budget. It will all come down to what kind of wingers you end up with. AML+ MR, the use the "normal 451" version. AMR+ML, then us the "Mirrored " version.
 
How many goals does the striker get compared to the rest of the team? I've been using this tactic for a while now but most of the goals come from the midfield. Defence is solid but I'm finding my striker getting constantly poor ratings. I'm using Ademilson, Fierro and Benteke and none are getting many goals :(
 
Well, I cant really have a discussion with somebody that has the standingpoint that SI and all their staff have been blatantly lying to us all these years and with somebody that uses those points you have raised to back it up. I just dont have the energy for it

Not even argueing its just obvious? Like Fifa has been proven to have ever somslight handicaps in some matches. I.e. playing at home/away or weather conditions sui certain teams yet EA Sports wont admit it? Just said your tactic was the best ive used so far and you start underlining words saying sports interactive have nothing to do with bias results.

Good tactic anyway ?
 
Not even argueing its just obvious? Like Fifa has been proven to have ever somslight handicaps in some matches. I.e. playing at home/away or weather conditions sui certain teams yet EA Sports wont admit it? Just said your tactic was the best ive used so far and you start underlining words saying sports interactive have nothing to do with bias results.

Good tactic anyway 

Then I missunderstood you. I thought you meant that SI had coded in some " elastic bands" that kicks in to ensure nobody gets to much succes and not just things that reflects real life, like complacency, players getting anxious when things suddenly goes against them, weather conditions, home/away advantages etc. These things ARE in the game but the game does not make a difference between users and AI controlled teams. If you start loosing matches all of a sudden, then it's because of these variables and not some coding from SI to MAKE you loose. The problem with game though is the lack of feedback regarding these issues. If really micromanaging, you can spot these issues BUT as this is just to time consuming, the feedback from the assman and the rest of the staff should be much better. Like reports from training suggesting that " a group of players seems to think the season is at the end", that just don't have to put in an effort etc etc


also, thanks for your kind words about the tactic
 
Then I missunderstood you. I thought you meant that SI had coded in some " elastic bands" that kicks in to ensure nobody gets to much succes and not just things that reflects real life, like complacency, players getting anxious when things suddenly goes against them, weather conditions, home/away advantages etc. These things ARE in the game but the game does not make a difference between users and AI controlled teams. If you start loosing matches all of a sudden, then it's because of these variables and not some coding from SI to MAKE you loose. The problem with game though is the lack of feedback regarding these issues. If really micromanaging, you can spot these issues BUT as this is just to time consuming, the feedback from the assman and the rest of the staff should be much better. Like reports from training suggesting that " a group of players seems to think the season is at the end", that just don't have to put in an effort etc etc


also, thanks for your kind words about the tactic

Ah yeah i see. Sorry for taking this so off topic. But this tactic really is great. Feels as if the game doesnt run proply unless this tactic is used. Well done
 
I am finding the one created for the TC is doing much better for than the Classic version. In Portugal with Boavista and last season finished sixth in the top flight with the classic version. Currently in 4th now after switching to the TC version and the football seems to be more fluid with it with more chances being created.
 
I am finding the one created for the TC is doing much better for than the Classic version. In Portugal with Boavista and last season finished sixth in the top flight with the classic version. Currently in 4th now after switching to the TC version and the football seems to be more fluid with it with more chances being created.

There should be NO difference between them though but its great that you feel like you are playing better this season.
 
Back
Top