The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
dont think Real will spend relatively 40m on him as he will probably play back-up to Higuan and Benzema is in top form so I dont see any reason on why Benzema should not be staying

Benzema=sold, if they get Kun. BTW, idk if its true, but Arsene 'The Big Spender' Wenger is showing interest in him. I mean Benzema.
Idk man, im ****** disappointed. Florentino 'The Stingy One' Perez said that he is not interested at this point, but hey, this is Perez we are talkin about.

IDK. Im freakin nervous.
 
Benzema=sold, if they get Kun. BTW, idk if its true, but Arsene 'The Big Spender' Wenger is showing interest in him. I mean Benzema.
Idk man, im ****** disappointed. Florentino 'The Stingy One' Perez said that he is not interested at this point, but hey, this is Perez we are talkin about.

IDK. Im freakin nervous.


still doubt RM are gonna sign him, its between Chelsea and Man City in my opinion
 
still doubt RM are gonna sign him, its between Chelsea and Man City in my opinion

Why on earth would he go to CITY?! WTF? I MEAN, THERE IS NO PROGRESS THERE? Its like from AM to Villareal or something like tha.
 
Why on earth would he go to CITY?! WTF? I MEAN, THERE IS NO PROGRESS THERE? Its like from AM to Villareal or something like tha.

No progress? City finished 3rd this season and had the same amount of points as Chelsea and have a gurrenteed spot in the Champions League. To say there is no progress from moving from Atletico to City is pretty stupid.

@Sol_Campbell - Seems like Redknapp has gone, good luck at Chelsea Harry you deserve all the success in the world.

Unlucky if this is true :P
 
Odds slashed and all over Twitter that Harry Redknapp is going to be named Chelsea manager by end of next week.

Chelsea fans thoughts?
 
stats dont tell you very important things, like whether the shot was a clear cut chance or a feeble long-range effort just to test the goalkeeper out so its very unfair to make decisions based on stats


btw I dont like Kalou and his personality, its not just this season but other incidents over various seasons as well, he is a good player no doubt about that but if we had to sell a player to make space for El Kun or Neymar, I'd put Kalou at the top of the list beyond Drogba

I would rather sell Kalou than Drogba aswell because Drogba contributes more to the team in assists and in build up play and is generally a better player, but I think the treatment that Kalou gets from the fans is unfair and I'm pretty sure that with Drogba having 85 more shots than Kalou he would have had more clear cut chances aswell or he is taking far too many shots from range.

And on the point of Redknapp joining as manager, I personally wouldn't have chosen him as I don't like his style and Lampard always scores against teams that Redknapp is managing so hopefully it won't mean own goals from Lampard next season :P
 
Last edited:
When you are posting **** like that:
Odds slashed and all over Twitter that Harry Redknapp is going to be named Chelsea manager by end of next week.

Chelsea fans thoughts?

post a reliable source too. such as BBC, SkySports.
Dont drop me some bull here and say Twitter. Wtf is Twitter? Is it a newspaper? A network? WTF is that?
even dailymail is more reliable than this ****.
 
Odds slashed and all over Twitter that Harry Redknapp is going to be named Chelsea manager by end of next week.

Chelsea fans thoughts?



both my heard and head is telling me Roman cannot make such a decision, Redkapp does not have a proven record in the PL or CL, he is pure utter bull in the transfer market dealings... please tell me this is not true, please
 
When you are posting **** like that:


post a reliable source too. such as BBC, SkySports.
Dont drop me some bull here and say Twitter. Wtf is Twitter? Is it a newspaper? A network? WTF is that?
even dailymail is more reliable than this ****.

No. If you follow the reputable people it's not, if you follow a fake account of a player who would have no idea, then yes.
 
No. If you follow the reputable people it's not, if you follow a fake account of a player who would have no idea, then yes.

1st - I dont follow a **** **** on this freakin thing named Twiter cuz I dont use it and im not gonna
2nd - And how the **** do u understand when its true or wrong? cuz on SkySports every posted thing is true.
 
I wouldnt mind, hes English for a start.
 
1st - I dont follow a **** **** on this freakin thing named Twiter cuz I dont use it and im not gonna
2nd - And how the **** do u understand when its true or wrong? cuz on SkySports every posted thing is true.

I didn't say YOU did, I meant in general.
Well if it comes from people like Guillem Ballague, Owen Gibson, reputable people who will not make up bullshit, you know it's not going to be fake don't you, genius.
 
1st - I dont follow a **** **** on this freakin thing named Twiter cuz I dont use it and im not gonna
2nd - And how the **** do u understand when its true or wrong? cuz on SkySports every posted thing is true.

How the **** is everything on SSN true? lmao.

Have you seen where they get most of their rumours from? THE PAPERS.
 
How the **** is everything on SSN true? lmao.

Have you seen where they get most of their rumours from? THE PAPERS.

I trust SSN more than alot of other sources. Guardian is best for me i feel.
 
Trying to look as some positives if Redknapp is appointed and there is a few i suspect. He is English which is rare for Chelsea, he plays attaking football which is what Roman wants, he could bring both or either Bale and Modric and it will be harder for him to financialy ruin us like he has done with all his former clubs.
 
Back
Top