The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
ChrisBird said:
I'm not fussed which we get, but I believe Lukaku will give 100% every game because of him supporting Chelsea and also his attitude. But, i can see Neymar drifting in and out of games and not working 100% and also sulking if he doesn't play.
Click to expand...

Same here, but if it was Neymar we got he would replace Sturridge and as an Englishman and a Chelsea fan i dont what that to happen. Sturridge deserves a proper chance at this club.

---------- Post added at 06:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------
ChrisBird said:
De Bruyne looks like a decent player TBH, but we're apparently loaning him straight out either to Anderlecht or back to Genk.
Click to expand...

Yer i think that would be the best thing, its ment to be part of the Lukaku deal. We sign Lukaku and let them have De Bruyne. I dont know much about the lad but hear he is an attaking midfielder so its proberly best he goes out on loan especially as we have Lucas comming in in January.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Same here, but if it was Neymar we got he would replace Sturridge and as an Englishman and a Chelsea fan i dont what that to happen. Sturridge deserves a proper chance at this club.

---------- Post added at 06:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------



Yer i think that would be the best thing, its ment to be part of the Lukaku deal. We sign Lukaku and let them have De Bruyne. I dont know much about the lad but hear he is an attaking midfielder so its proberly best he goes out on loan especially as we have Lucas comming in in January.
Click to expand...

He plays either as an attacking mid, lef mid or left winger mainly, but I'm pretty sure he can play on the right or as striker if needed. Here's a clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USUtxUW_QrI
 
I've heard that De Bruyne might go on loan to Anderlecht as part of the Lukaku deal.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Obviously you cant read too much into youtube clips but from the clips he looks very good indeed. Has a wonderfull eye for a pass and can strike a ball very well too.
Click to expand...

I agree about the youtube thing. I mean when we signed Zhirkov I looked at a vid of him and thought we made an amazing signing XD
 
To be fair with the Zhrikov signing, I followed him through Russian Football and he was one of the standout players. I just think he didn't get a good run as far as I remember.
 
cfc12345 said:
I agree about the youtube thing. I mean when we signed Zhirkov I looked at a vid of him and thought we made an amazing signing XD
Click to expand...

He is amazing! We've not given him a good chance and when he's had a run in the team he's been without a doubt one of our best players. I thought Carlo did a great job but he was stupid not to play Zhirkov more. I know he's had a few injuries, but when he was fit he was hardly played.
 
cZeur said:
To be fair with the Zhrikov signing, I followed him through Russian Football and he was one of the standout players. I just think he didn't get a good run as far as I remember.
Click to expand...

At times he has looked very good for Chelsea too but i think he has been in and out of the team too much and has been injured too often.
 
ofcourse Zhirkov would be much better in the russian league it isnt as big as the prem and doesnt posses the same quality players. He is pretty decent but imo will never do in the prem what he did for CSKA Moskow in russia
 
Zhirkov should never had went to Chelsea as he wasnt needed basically. He is good enough for any Champions League team apart from Chelsea imo. Would be a good signing for Barca even as a Lb.
 
cfc12345 said:
ofcourse Zhirkov would be much better in the russian league it isnt as big as the prem and doesnt posses the same quality players. He is pretty decent but imo will never do in the prem what he did for CSKA Moskow in russia
Click to expand...

Pretty much every game he plays he's one of our most consistent performers. He does hardly anything wrong and his game is perfect for the prem. Face it we wrecked one of the best wingers in the world.
 
Aye, Zhirkov would be a good player for most teams in the world, **** I wouldn't mind him here.
 
CJACKO11 said:
I dunno about that, he was given chances but was way to inconsistant. And then Malouda found his form so Zhirkov had no chance of getting in the side.
Click to expand...

He's been a consistent player when played?! :S Then Malouda plays pretty much every game despite being without a doubt our most inconsistent player.
 
Shay Given said:
Zhirkov should never had went to Chelsea as he wasnt needed basically. He is good enough for any Champions League team apart from Chelsea imo. Would be a good signing for Barca even as a Lb.
Click to expand...

He was linked with Barca but chose us because Hiddink basicly told him to join Chelsea.

ChrisBird said:
Pretty much every game he plays he's one of our most consistent performers. He does hardly anything wrong and his game is perfect for the prem. Face it we wrecked one of the best wingers in the world.
Click to expand...

Again we did not wreck him. He has been either too inconsistant or injured and when he was fit Malouda was having his best 18months in a Chelsea shirt.

---------- Post added at 08:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------
ChrisBird said:
He's been a consistent player when played?! :S Then Malouda plays pretty much every game despite being without a doubt our most inconsistent player.
Click to expand...

For example earlier this season he went through a patch of playing 2-3 games in a row where he was our best player, we than faced a tough opponent to where he had a very poor game and then struggled to find his form again after that.
 
Jacko Zhirkov hasnt had enough games in a row to be called inconsistant.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Again we did not wreck him. He has been either too inconsistant or injured and when he was fit Malouda was having his best 18months in a Chelsea shirt.

For example earlier this season he went through a patch of playing 2-3 games in a row where he was our best player, we than faced a tough opponent to where he had a very poor game and then struggled to find his form again after that.
Click to expand...

Malouda was good last season, but what about the past 6-7 months? He's been his old inconsistent, greedy self.

Name me the tough opponents he struggled against? And by 'tough opponents' do you mean top teams or physical sides? e.g. Stoke and Blackburn. Against the B'burn he had one of his best appearances for Chelsea and chipped in with a vital assist. Or top teams like Man Utd where he had one of his better appearances.

---------- Post added at 08:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 PM ----------
cfc12345 said:
ofcourse Zhirkov would be much better in the russian league it isnt as big as the prem and doesnt posses the same quality players. He is pretty decent but imo will never do in the prem what he did for CSKA Moskow in russia
Click to expand...

Oh, and what about Euro 2008 where he was one of the players of the tournament?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top