The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
I didnt complain to Sky, im not that petty.

But you were moaning about it in forum. You even said Sky pay his wages something like that.

---------- Post added at 04:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------

To be fair, i think its not really appropriate for someone holding a high position in the club to speak like that. But then again, most of you don't take it offensively. It might be just that me and sunilvk7 are easily offended.

Exactly except I'm not offended :p
 
But you were moaning about it in forum. You even said Sky pay his wages something like that.

---------- Post added at 04:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------



Exactly except I'm not offended :p
#

I said he should know better and yes Sky do pay majority of his wages. My main argument was the people backing him that was all. Personly he can do anything he likes on the pitch that will make him miss games, more the merrier.
 
To be fair, i think its not really appropriate for someone holding a high position in the club to speak like that. But then again, most of you don't take it offensively. It might be just that me and sunilvk7 are easily offended.


how one can take it offensively I dont know? All he said was ' Come on Lads, lets beat the **** out of Arsenal'... he did not insult Arsenal Football Club in any way or anything like that, all he did was to rally the supporters

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill... jeez even if The Sun did not give a **** about Bruce Buck's quote
 
Let's just drop it. It's pretty clear that we all think that Sunil doesn't have a leg to stand on, so rather than have pages and pages of him claiming it's offensive without every actually saying why, let's focus on the match shall we?

Scores gentlemen?
 
Let's just drop it. It's pretty clear that we all think that Sunil doesn't have a leg to stand on, so rather than have pages and pages of him claiming it's offensive without every actually saying why, let's focus on the match shall we?

Scores gentlemen?

Eh? I started about Drogba and ManCity which was ignored so many times. What excuses for these? Yeah light hearted humor. ffs.
 
Let's just drop it. It's pretty clear that we all think that Sunil doesn't have a leg to stand on, so rather than have pages and pages of him claiming it's offensive without every actually saying why, let's focus on the match shall we?

Scores gentlemen?


I am going with 3-1 to Chelsea

Torres to grab a double and Ramires to score one and as is usual with us this season, we more or less drift off from the game in the last 10min with a 3-0 lead and RVP scores against us jangling a few nerves but all in all, it is going to be a close game
 
Well, two are needed for the dance ( is this grammatically correct ?) ;)


it is impolite to refuse a dance when offered if that made sense

---------- Post added at 07:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 PM ----------

I just posted that and yours lot got worked up for that. ;)


oh the irony, blaming us for getting worked up when u got worked up over a simple sentence from Bruce Buck
 
it is impolite to refuse a dance when offered if that made sense

---------- Post added at 07:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 PM ----------




oh the irony, blaming us for getting worked up when u got worked up over a simple sentence from Bruce Buck

I guess.
Im getting off this thread, don't wont to be involved in this silly argument. Swiiiish...
 
I guess.
Im getting off this thread, don't wont to be involved in this silly argument. Swiiiish...

you wont be missed either ;) and glad u think its a silly argument, I have been trying to tell that to Sunil since yesterday
 
oh the irony, blaming us for getting worked up when u got worked up over a simple sentence from Bruce Buck

Why will I get worked up making childish comments on Arsenal and City? Jeez. I said Drogba and City comments were childish which you have ignored N times, which is not surprising.
 
I hope we beat the **** out of everyone this year! ;)

---------- Post added at 12:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 PM ----------

Arsenal: Szczesny, Djourou, Mertesacker, Koscielny, Santos, Ramsey, Song, Arteta, Walcott, Van Persie, Gervinho.
Subs: Fabianski, Jenkinson, Vermaelen, Frimprong, Park, Rosicky, Arshavin.

Chelsea: Cech, Bosingwa, Ivanovic , Terry, Cole, Ramires, Mikel, Lampard, Sturridge, Torres, Mata
Subs: Blackman (JT's favourite player) , Bertrand, Luiz, Romeu, Meireles, Malouda, Lukaku.
 
I hope we beat the **** out of everyone this year! ;)

---------- Post added at 12:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 PM ----------

Arsenal: Szczesny, Djourou, Mertesacker, Koscielny, Santos, Ramsey, Song, Arteta, Walcott, Van Persie, Gervinho.
Subs: Fabianski, Jenkinson, Vermaelen, Frimprong, Park, Rosicky, Arshavin.

Chelsea: Cech, Bosingwa, Ivanovic , Terry, Cole, Ramires, Mikel, Lampard, Sturridge, Torres, Mata
Subs: Blackman (JT's favourite player) , Bertrand, Luiz, Romeu, Meireles, Malouda, Lukaku.

there's a match thread you know ;)
 
That second half was woeful, we seemed to lose all desire to win it. Terribly overhit back by Malouda (who else?) put Terry under pressure. Torres might as well not have been there. The defence looks shocking and Mikel didn't do a great job of shielding them. The attack (excluding Mata) was poor: you can't be that wasteful against a terrible defence if you want to challenge for the title.

All in all, pretty ****. However, we've let ourselves get a bit carried away this season: this was always meant to be the start of our rebirth, not the finished product. Hopefully the club will press on in January/the summer and we'll get a creative CM, a new RB, a new CB perhaps and possibly a wide right player (Sturridge has a lot of potential but he's nowhere near worldclass atm and I can't see him being there for quite some time)
 
Back
Top