[/QUOTE]
How exactly have I taken a potshot at you? If posting a simple picture offends you then you are a sensitive soul like I have quoted before.. If you persist to keep this petty feud up you think you have with me then carry on by yourself but I suppose that would be too much for you to handle.
I don't think it's a petty feud to be honest. You made a claim that people who call Glen Johnson **** are those who don't go to stadiums. I disagreed with it and provided a rebuttal. You then somehow twisted that a debate about how I am always on your back. Umm no ... This is a public forum. You are not engaged in a private conversation with anyone here. If you post opinions on here then be prepared to have them called out. If you can't handle that then stop positing. Simple
Also regarding the sensitive soul argument. I genuinely don't get this at all. You first insult someone and then when the person takes it up with you, you accuse him of being a sensitive soul. I am not sure how old you are but try calling someone on the street a moronic troll and see what happens to you ... I doubt the 'sensitive soul' argument will help you much while you are getting your face knocked in
My proper opinion was about GodCubed originally but you seem to get your name and his muddled up and not for the first time. I am sure he does not need some sort of internet security guard carrying out his own opinions. Anyhow as I have said to you before please keep this petty stuff you persist on throwing at me off the forums and PM me if you really like to engage in a slanging match that is to your level.
Hmm I would agree with you if you and GodCubed were standing in a street corner conversing in whispers but this is a public forum. You posted your opinion on a public forum. Therefore, I came in and rebutted your argument. You are the one who turned this petty by posting that picture and completely twisting the debate instead of actually defending your original argument. So I am guessing you realized your point was flimsy and decided to try and completely twist the debate
Nonetheless, I apologize if you honestly and genuinely think I am getting on your back. I assure you that it isn't my intention in the first place. I was just trying tk engage with you on your ludicrous claim about Glen Johnson
had an opinion on a matter. GodCubed had his and you waded in with nothing of your concern because I replied to him. Now who took the potshot at me and when I fired back you get all sensitive about it. I expect yet another response from you now on this thread but if you can't do it the proper way by PM as I have asked you to do then please go ahead and make yourself a fool again like the last time you wanted to make an argument of it on a thread. Please keep on topic.
Hmm again this sensitivity argument sighs ... You posted a picture accusing me of being a troll. I decides to give some of it back to you. I don't see how that's being a sensitive soul. You can hardly expect me to take something like that lying down and brush it off. Actually I might have if you actually brought the debate back to it's original grounds like I have tried to do since the start. Again I apologise if you still think I am a moronic troll/sensitive souls/other insults
So okay let's get back on topic, a few simple questions for you. Please don't reply if you have no intention of answering them. I don't want to clog up the thread
1. Do you think Glen Johnson is good enough for Liverpool?
2. Why aren't non-stadium fans allowed to have an opinion about a player?