So I was called a fool again for having a different opinion than others. Back when I questioned Moyes' sketchy record when making big signings by putting up a list of expensive signings he made for Everton, I was called a fool. When I was questioning Moyes' ability to be our manager when we were dropping games after games at home, I was called a fool yet again with a few others. Now that I say Moyes is worse than Glazers, I'm called a fool again. Whenever someone else have a different opinion, he is a fool, as if the one calling me a fool is the most brilliant person in the world.
Glazers raised the ticket prices by so much that we actually have the 9th most expensive season tickets in the league! Such audacity, what monstrosity. Glazer sucked money out of the club, I never denied that. They used a lot of money, that would have gone to the shareholders anyway, to pay for their own debt. They took more than they deserve, and we are at least 500-600m (a rough estimate after deducting the supposed amount that will go to the shareholders) down because of them, and that accumulated after 10 years, with an average of 50-60m/loss per year, which is actually a lot. But seriously, do you guys think that all of that money would have gone into player transfers? That they would be used to benefit the club? Some of it will, I agree, that is why I still hate Glazers, but it is simply childish to think that 100% of them will be used in benefit of the club.
Now let's take a look at Moyes. In 1 failed season, we have lost out on at least 50-60m worth of money from CL. We did not even get into Europa League too, so our UEFA coefficient would suffer a lot. Once the coefficient our high-achieving year of 2010/11 rolls out, We would drop at least into the 3rd pot, because our CL results in the past 3 years haven't been that stellar as well. He also splashed out 27.5m on Fellaini, and the compensation for sacking him were said to be around 5m. He also have a high salary, which is said to be at 6m per year. The sacking of his own staffs would need an amount of compensation too, which is estimated by Guardian at 1.5. So his appointment cost us at least 60m+5m+6m+1.5m+27.5m = 90m losses in just a year. 90m/year vs 60m/year, that what I based my opinions on. That is only factoring in the direct amount of losses caused, neglecting the drop in share prices, setting us a year back and the supposed amount of money needed to fix his troubles.
I don't even like Glazers. There is a reason why I stated that they are the second worst thing for the club. I actually feel disgusted to be even trying to defend them. But there is also a reason why the likes of SAF and Gill comes out and say that they are not as disruptive as the fans would like to believe. SAF could take a pop at them from his autobiography, but he did not. People just hate on Glazer more than they should because they are rich people abusing the poor to get more money.
Anyway, don't even bother answering me. I know how people on this forum reacts - hops onto the moderator's **** and bash on people who has different opinion than him. I have been here long enough, and this is one of the forums I know where the elitists reign supreme. Ban me if you want for having a different opinion than you, or insult me again, because that what I'm actually expecting.
Also think Blackett will start a lot over Evans this season going on what LVG said.
surprising.