Stark and Mahmoud who have been impressing in Germany youth levels. Cant believe City have let go of Savic and Nastasic.
Maybe they'll soon realise Kompany was the problem and not his partners.....
Stark and Mahmoud who have been impressing in Germany youth levels. Cant believe City have let go of Savic and Nastasic.
Maybe they'll soon realise Kompany was the problem and not his partners.....
Was Savic gash or not given a chance, was he there only 1 season?Savic was gash, Nastatic was ok, but cant play the higher line we wanted to play.
Was Savic gash or not given a chance, was he there only 1 season?
Oh right could not really remember tbh. Just thought it was a bit rash after 1 season to get rid considering his age and new league. Turning out good now though seen few top clubs linked abroad.No, he was terrible, positional sense was awful for a player at that level, game was too fast he couldnt recover in time, unlike say Richards who had the same issue but the pace to get back to correct it
2 years back, we just came off finishing 6th and won the CL through some very good luck. Please show me where I said Chelsea had a very good team. Only thing I said was that Mata was world-class but unfortunately, one world-class player does not make a world-class team. It was a very limited team in Jose's first season. No striker and completely unbalanced midfield which prevented us from challenging for the title since Ancelloti left. He took that limited team to a title challenge despite having CL commitments. Am I saying it's a terrible team? No I am saying it was a limited team. Catch the nuance
Same with LVG. He doesn't have a very good squad and it's limited but it does have some world-class talent like Falcao, RVP, Di Maria, Rooney, Mata, De Gea, Januzaj and Herrera. He should be doing far better especially when compared to what Jose achievieved with a smiliarly limited squad that did have talented players in Hazard, Oscar as you mentioned
I would not be surprised, but if rumours are true going round in Holland Depay is one of our main targets and has even spoke with LVG.
Only if they go for Pogba as well, its one marquee a year until the court case or new sponsership deal is announced.
I can see United not even hesitating to spend any amount on Bale. I would say City would also be interested but FFP may stop that
Would be very surprised to see us spending 100 Million on Bale, no way he is worth anywhere near that. If it's around 50 Million then we might. Would be excellent addition to the team, his pace and finishing is very good.
You may overpay but without doubt it would be a fantastic signing nonetheless
Yeah we will overpay for sure if we ever sign him but if we ever pay 100 plus million on Bale then I will lose all the hope on Woodward. You can sign any player in the world you want to except 4 or 5 players for that money.
Dont get me wrong, i'm not saying he is worth that amount but there would not be many better options in world football than Bale barring the obvious top 5
Played and lived in England, been very successful (at least for one season) so wouldn't take much time, if any, to adapt to surroundings
If he was to sign people may bulk at the price but i'm almost positive United would see the benefits very quickly
If he doesn't get top4, then he 'should' be gone. With the amount of players he spent, and the amount of really good players we have, it 'shouldn't' be that hard. But for some reason it is. Yes, injuries slowed him down, but he also made some late calls, like overplaying unfit Falcao with hope he'll find his trigger again, something clubs can't do in Uniteds position. I really hope he stays, but I wouldn't be surprised if he leaves at the end of the season. And then problems starts all over again.Sadly, if we do not make top 4, Van gaal will be gone