Ok, let let rephrase it. Tell me one source that makes the transfer story reliable or believable.
What story?
Quotes do not prove that this is a story going anywhere. Again you ignore the fact the owner could be playing to the crowd, like an agent does. You've made the very big assumption that the owner is absolutely telling truth.
Ok, let let rephrase it. Tell me one source that makes the transfer story reliable or believable.
So you want me to provide a source to prove a story that I don't think is true, is reliable?
No. I want to know what transfer stories you believe has legs and what sources do you believe.
For example, almost everyone though Baines to United story has legs, what made you think it did?
Or he maybe telling the truth?
Edit: As much as I'm, you are making that much big assumption that owner is not telling the truth.
I don't believe any transfer rumours until something appears on a reputable English site.
This appeared on reputed Brazilian paper and according to the Brazilian lad I asked this is the most reputed paper in Brazil and also in red cafe few Brazilian ( I think) have said same thing. So this make as much sense as what we read on Guardian or any good paper.
The difference is i accept it could be either, but that we dont know, thast the point.You have already decided that he is only telling truth and that it couldn't be anything else. When you compare it to what else has gone forward, United finances, United's tendency when it comes to buying players, United's priorities, the other nonsense stories around it, it points far more to it not happening, that a real story with with genuine legs.
And when reputable papers in say, France, report something, our own national papers research it themselves, and if they find it has legs, they post it for themselves. Where is such story sourcing the Brazilian paper? And one guy in Brazil? Wow. An awful lot of people you could ask what the most reputable English paper is, and I guarantee you they'll reply with a redtop.
And when reputable papers in say, France, report something, our own national papers research it themselves, and if they find it has legs, they post it for themselves. Where is such story sourcing the Brazilian paper? And one guy in Brazil? Wow. An awful lot of people you could ask what the most reputable English paper is, and I guarantee you they'll reply with a redtop.
Well I couldn't conduct a survey in Brazil, excuse me for that. And it is not just one person, I have said few on redcafe even said same.
BBC have picked up the story long back.
I don't believe any transfer rumours until something appears on a reputable English site.
On their gossip column? Oh my. And the collective IQ of redcafe users would struggle to make triple digits.
Even then I trail back to see where they got their info, and who did the article.
And the person (you believe) who did the article never got anything wrong? To consider that as non story?
Going with excuses you can just say every transfer is a non story, even the Oscar to Cheslea one.
This doesn't even make sense.
Anyways I'm done with this useless debate. You can deny any transfer you want to with all the excuses. There are many factors to make this story believable rather than just saying twitter rubbish. Whether we sign him or not is differnet issue, just like with Sneijder.