And also, the disrespect to say Poch is not an upgrade over OGS ???. C'mon now lads. Now you can criticize Poch's lack of silverware but you can't deny the impact he had at spurs. He turned them from a banter side, the side you never worried about when it came to sniffing trophies, to a side able to match the best sides in Europe on a consistent basis. He turned them into a serious threat. The players never "stopped playing for him", they squad just needed a refresh which he never got. He spent 350 million pounds over how many years at spurs? 6.5 years? That's barely £60 million a season which is nothing these days. Spurs still competed consistently against teams that would spend £150 million a season. That, imo, is a success.
Ask yourselves this question: would you trust OGS, a manager who got Cardiff relegated, with the job of a rebuild? Or Poch, a manager who pretty much rebuilt a team to compete with teams spending relatively larger sums? He'd get backed better at United than he did at spurs so that'll be interesting.