Scouseinthehouse
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2015
- Messages
- 21,566
- Reaction score
- 4,741
- Points
- 113
So generally, I'd say OGS has turned us to a side very capable of killing teams off on the break but on the flip side, not every side will do a leeds and open themselves up. It's rather reactive than proactive.
When we are tasked with finding a way through organized and compact sides, we look clueless with the ball and have to rely on individual brilliance to win us a game. If certain players have off days, we struggle and eventually concede some ridiculous goal that'll leave our defenders trying to pass blame.
Essentially, a plan B is our plan A and if a savvy coach snuffs out our threat on the break, we're lost. Klopp did this very well on both occasions last season while other better sides just played into our hands.
Which is pretty much Spice Boys MKII. That’s as good an analogy as I can think of.
Those Evans sides were the same as this current Utd one. Played brilliant, attacking football in their day and could rip any team to bits on the break. Packed full of top quality individual talent. But they couldn’t defend for **** either like this Utd side and relied on teams either playing into their hands, a massive strike of luck, or a piece of individual brilliance when better teams negated their strength. All like this current Utd incarnation. And like you now, the fragility in those sides was unreal. A few players had an off day and things went against them, it invariably turned to ****.
Great entertainment but ultimately frustrating as F that left us a Country mile behind Utd.
Similarities are stark.
It only started to turn into success when Houllier took over and became more pragmatic by instilling tactical discipline into them and shoring up the back end. It wasn’t half as entertaining as Evans sides. But it started to bridge the gap and reestablish ourselves at home and abroad.