Ornstein/ The Telegraph etc are reporting it as £52 million rising to £58.8 mate FWIW.
Lille centre-back, regarded as a generational talent, also wanted by Real Madrid, Liverpool and Paris St-Germain
www.telegraph.co.uk
I can’t think of any teenage CH coming close to this package ever. For a stark comparison, not that I think he’s going anywhere, but if Trent, who is generational and one of the best right full’s in history, was put on the market, in the last year of his contract as he now is, L’pool would struggle to get takers at £60 million.
I’ll preface this by saying I’ve never so much as seen him play. So I don’t know how high or not his potential is. It’s patently there as L’pool were very interested. But only at the right opportunity/ price for a lad that would effectively have been, right here, right now, a 4th choice deep CH option to develop. That fee/ wages Utd have done ended that and was way too rich even for Madrid. All I would say is one season in the French League, which lets be honest is gash quality outside of PSG, with stats that Quansah P all over in almost every category, makes it even more ridiculous to me. Now I don’t know if Quansah will dip his second season. But given he did that, in the PL, where there is no comparison to France, it puts it all in stark prespective.
Lille have, yet again, like they did with Pepe, played an absolute blinder to get a fee well over any current market value. Made even better by him being in the last year of his deal. The Mount/ Sancho comparisons are glaring in context mate which makes this more of the Glazers usual MO.
And its not even INEOS fault as these are inherited issues where Utd have fallen to such depths, massively over paying is the only way you can attract/ compete with the likes of Madrid and L’pool.
It’s just amusing the hypocrisy of everyone saying it’s different. When they’d be fuming if the name running these deals were ‘Glazer’ and not ‘INEOS.’